Network Profile
View Network Math
Overall Strength
1.27%
of network
Direct Connections
4
Node & Network Strength Details
×
How is this calculated? The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the website.
Every tag forms a network link. The pie charts below show each connected post's base strength (PV) and influence (IV) as a share of this post's direct neighbourhood.
Outbound
2
Tags on post
Inbound
2
Posts tagging this
Base Node Strength
4
Base Node Influence
1
Connected Nodes
15
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
This Post (1.27%) Dougie MacLean (1.27%) Iain MacInnes (1.27%) Malcolm Bushby (1.27%) Alan MacLeod (1.27%) Bill Bourne (1.27%) Duncan J. Nicholson (1.27%) Hudson Swan (1.27%) John Martin (7) (1.27%) Kenny Forsyth (1.27%) Les Wilson (2) (1.27%) Mike Ward (3) (1.27%) Phil Smillie (2) (1.27%) Roy Gullane (1.27%) Stuart Morison (1.27%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart) The Tannahill Weavers 81.01%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
This Post (6.25%) Dougie MacLean (6.25%) Iain MacInnes (6.25%) Malcolm Bushby (6.25%) The Tannahill Weavers (6.25%) Alan MacLeod (6.25%) Bill Bourne (6.25%) Duncan J. Nicholson (6.25%) Hudson Swan (6.25%) John Martin (7) (6.25%) Kenny Forsyth (6.25%) Les Wilson (2) (6.25%) Mike Ward (3) (6.25%) Phil Smillie (2) (6.25%) Roy Gullane (6.25%) Stuart Morison (6.25%)
Connected Network (How neighbours affect this node)
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)
Last calculated math cycle: May 4, 12:41 AM
Close Report
Analyzing Network Connections...
Most Relevant
Most Integral
Depth: 1 Level
Depth: 2 Levels
Depth: 3 Levels
Depth: 4 Levels
Depth: 5 Levels
Depth: 6 Levels
Depth: 7 Levels
👁️ 22 ViewsRelated Content No related content found.