Network Profile
Overall Strength
1.27%
of network
(274.88B)
Direct Connections
4
Node & Network Strength Details
How is this calculated? The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the website.
Every tag forms a network link. The pie charts below show each connected post's base strength (PV) and influence (IV) as a share of this post's direct neighbourhood.
Outbound
2
Tags on post
Inbound
2
Posts tagging this
Base Node Strength
4
Base Node Influence
1
Connected Nodes
15
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
- This Post (1.27%)
- Dougie MacLean (1.27%)
- Iain MacInnes (1.27%)
- Malcolm Bushby (1.27%)
- Bill Bourne (1.27%)
- Duncan J. Nicholson (1.27%)
- Hudson Swan (1.27%)
- John Martin (7) (1.27%)
- Kenny Forsyth (1.27%)
- Les Wilson (2) (1.27%)
- Mike Ward (3) (1.27%)
- Phil Smillie (2) (1.27%)
- Roy Gullane (1.27%)
- Struan Thorpe (1.27%)
- Stuart Morison (1.27%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)The Tannahill Weavers 81.01%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
- This Post (6.25%)
- Dougie MacLean (6.25%)
- Iain MacInnes (6.25%)
- Malcolm Bushby (6.25%)
- The Tannahill Weavers (6.25%)
- Bill Bourne (6.25%)
- Duncan J. Nicholson (6.25%)
- Hudson Swan (6.25%)
- John Martin (7) (6.25%)
- Kenny Forsyth (6.25%)
- Les Wilson (2) (6.25%)
- Mike Ward (3) (6.25%)
- Phil Smillie (2) (6.25%)
- Roy Gullane (6.25%)
- Struan Thorpe (6.25%)
- Stuart Morison (6.25%)
Connected Network (How neighbours affect this node)
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)
Last calculated math cycle: May 4, 2:49 AM
Analyzing Network Connections...
👁️ 25 Views
Related Content
No related content found.