Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Clear and Present DangerDean Jones
James Earl Jones
Miguel SandovalAnn MagnusonWillem DafoeHarris YulinTom TammiAnne ArcherDonald Moffat

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 2 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Tim Grimm

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.12% of network
(2.39 × 1022)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.12%)
  • Harrison Ford (8.29%)
  • Benjamin Bratt (7.36%)
  • Anne Archer (4.14%)
  • Thora Birch (2.88%)
  • Donald Moffat (2.88%)
  • Miguel Sandoval (2.88%)
  • James Earl Jones (2.30%)
  • Kim Flowers (1.84%)
  • Raymond Cruz (1.84%)
  • Belita Moreno (1.84%)
  • Harris Yulin (1.84%)
  • Dean Jones (1.38%)
  • Tom Tammi (1.04%)
  • Hope Lange (0.12%)
  • Ann Magnuson (0.12%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Clear and Present Danger 33.26%Willem Dafoe 25.89%
Influence Score
i
5.48% of network
(1.2)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (5.48%)
  • Dean Jones (7.30%)
  • Harrison Ford (6.16%)
  • Hope Lange (5.48%)
  • Thora Birch (5.48%)
  • Kim Flowers (5.48%)
  • Raymond Cruz (5.48%)
  • Clear and Present Danger (5.48%)
  • Willem Dafoe (5.48%)
  • Ann Magnuson (5.48%)
  • Anne Archer (5.48%)
  • Belita Moreno (5.48%)
  • Benjamin Bratt (5.48%)
  • Donald Moffat (5.48%)
  • Harris Yulin (5.48%)
  • Miguel Sandoval (5.48%)
  • Tom Tammi (5.48%)
  • James Earl Jones (4.38%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 17 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 12 [Dean Jones] *
                            72 [Harrison Ford] *
                            1 [Hope Lange] *
                            25 [Thora Birch] *
                            16 [Kim Flowers] *
                            16 [Raymond Cruz] *
                            289 [Clear and Present Danger] *
                            225 [Willem Dafoe] *
                            1 [Ann Magnuson] *
                            36 [Anne Archer] *
                            16 [Belita Moreno] *
                            64 [Benjamin Bratt] *
                            25 [Donald Moffat] *
                            16 [Harris Yulin] *
                            25 [Miguel Sandoval] *
                            9 [Tom Tammi] *
                            20 [James Earl Jones]
                           )

                         = 2.39 x 10^22

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1.33 [Dean Jones] *
                            1.13 [Harrison Ford] *
                            1 [Hope Lange] *
                            1 [Thora Birch] *
                            1 [Kim Flowers] *
                            1 [Raymond Cruz] *
                            1 [Clear and Present Danger] *
                            1 [Willem Dafoe] *
                            1 [Ann Magnuson] *
                            1 [Anne Archer] *
                            1 [Belita Moreno] *
                            1 [Benjamin Bratt] *
                            1 [Donald Moffat] *
                            1 [Harris Yulin] *
                            1 [Miguel Sandoval] *
                            1 [Tom Tammi] *
                            0.8 [James Earl Jones]
                           )

                         = 1.2
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 17 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.12% (2.39 × 1022 overall)
  • This Post (0.12%)
  • Harrison Ford (8.29%)
  • Benjamin Bratt (7.36%)
  • Anne Archer (4.14%)
  • Thora Birch (2.88%)
  • Donald Moffat (2.88%)
  • Miguel Sandoval (2.88%)
  • James Earl Jones (2.30%)
  • Kim Flowers (1.84%)
  • Raymond Cruz (1.84%)
  • Belita Moreno (1.84%)
  • Harris Yulin (1.84%)
  • Dean Jones (1.38%)
  • Tom Tammi (1.04%)
  • Hope Lange (0.12%)
  • Ann Magnuson (0.12%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Clear and Present Danger 33.26%Willem Dafoe 25.89%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
5.48% (1.2 overall)
  • This Post (5.48%)
  • Dean Jones (7.30%)
  • Harrison Ford (6.16%)
  • Hope Lange (5.48%)
  • Thora Birch (5.48%)
  • Kim Flowers (5.48%)
  • Raymond Cruz (5.48%)
  • Clear and Present Danger (5.48%)
  • Willem Dafoe (5.48%)
  • Ann Magnuson (5.48%)
  • Anne Archer (5.48%)
  • Belita Moreno (5.48%)
  • Benjamin Bratt (5.48%)
  • Donald Moffat (5.48%)
  • Harris Yulin (5.48%)
  • Miguel Sandoval (5.48%)
  • Tom Tammi (5.48%)
  • James Earl Jones (4.38%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Dean Jones ↗
Str: 12Inf: 1.33
Harrison Ford ↗
Str: 72Inf: 1.13
Hope Lange ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Thora Birch ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Kim Flowers ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Raymond Cruz ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Clear and Present Danger ↗
Str: 289Inf: 1
Willem Dafoe ↗
Str: 225Inf: 1
Ann Magnuson ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Anne Archer ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Belita Moreno ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Benjamin Bratt ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Donald Moffat ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Harris Yulin ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Miguel Sandoval ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Tom Tammi ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
James Earl Jones ↗
Str: 20Inf: 0.8
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
James Earl Jones ↗
Str: 20Inf: 0.8
Tom Tammi ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Miguel Sandoval ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Harris Yulin ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Donald Moffat ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Benjamin Bratt ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Belita Moreno ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Anne Archer ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Ann Magnuson ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Willem Dafoe ↗
Str: 225Inf: 1
Clear and Present Danger ↗
Str: 289Inf: 1
Raymond Cruz ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Kim Flowers ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Thora Birch ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Hope Lange ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Harrison Ford ↗
Str: 72Inf: 1.13
Dean Jones ↗
Str: 12Inf: 1.33

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Clear and Present Danger
Inbound Posts (1)
Clear and Present Danger
Last calculated: Jun 21, 6:21 PM
34

Related Content

Actors

  • Hope Lange
  • Anne Archer
  • Dean Jones
  • Thora Birch
  • Belita Moreno
  • Kim Flowers
  • Benjamin Bratt
  • Raymond Cruz
  • Donald Moffat
  • Harris Yulin
  • Harrison Ford
  • James Earl Jones
  • Willem Dafoe
  • Miguel Sandoval
  • Ann Magnuson
  • Tom Tammi

Films

  • Clear and Present Danger