Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Clear and Present DangerDean Jones
James Earl Jones
Miguel SandovalWillem DafoeHarris YulinTim GrimmKim FlowersTom TammiAnne Archer

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 12 hours ago
Comments: 0

Darragh Lennon
Last login: 3 days ago
Comments: 0

Cathal Kennedy
Last login: 1 week ago
Comments: 0

jacierlogyn
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Ann Magnuson

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.12% of network
(2.12 × 1022)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.12%)
  • Harrison Ford (7.43%)
  • Benjamin Bratt (7.43%)
  • Anne Archer (4.18%)
  • Thora Birch (2.90%)
  • Donald Moffat (2.90%)
  • Miguel Sandoval (2.90%)
  • James Earl Jones (2.32%)
  • Kim Flowers (1.86%)
  • Raymond Cruz (1.86%)
  • Belita Moreno (1.86%)
  • Harris Yulin (1.86%)
  • Dean Jones (1.39%)
  • Tom Tammi (1.05%)
  • Hope Lange (0.12%)
  • Tim Grimm (0.12%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Clear and Present Danger 33.57%Willem Dafoe 26.13%
Influence Score
i
5.51% of network
(1.07)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (5.51%)
  • Dean Jones (7.35%)
  • Hope Lange (5.51%)
  • Thora Birch (5.51%)
  • Kim Flowers (5.51%)
  • Raymond Cruz (5.51%)
  • Clear and Present Danger (5.51%)
  • Harrison Ford (5.51%)
  • Willem Dafoe (5.51%)
  • Anne Archer (5.51%)
  • Belita Moreno (5.51%)
  • Benjamin Bratt (5.51%)
  • Donald Moffat (5.51%)
  • Harris Yulin (5.51%)
  • Miguel Sandoval (5.51%)
  • Tim Grimm (5.51%)
  • Tom Tammi (5.51%)
  • James Earl Jones (4.41%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 17 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 12 [Dean Jones] *
                            1 [Hope Lange] *
                            25 [Thora Birch] *
                            16 [Kim Flowers] *
                            16 [Raymond Cruz] *
                            289 [Clear and Present Danger] *
                            64 [Harrison Ford] *
                            225 [Willem Dafoe] *
                            36 [Anne Archer] *
                            16 [Belita Moreno] *
                            64 [Benjamin Bratt] *
                            25 [Donald Moffat] *
                            16 [Harris Yulin] *
                            25 [Miguel Sandoval] *
                            1 [Tim Grimm] *
                            9 [Tom Tammi] *
                            20 [James Earl Jones]
                           )

                         = 2.12 x 10^22

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1.33 [Dean Jones] *
                            1 [Hope Lange] *
                            1 [Thora Birch] *
                            1 [Kim Flowers] *
                            1 [Raymond Cruz] *
                            1 [Clear and Present Danger] *
                            1 [Harrison Ford] *
                            1 [Willem Dafoe] *
                            1 [Anne Archer] *
                            1 [Belita Moreno] *
                            1 [Benjamin Bratt] *
                            1 [Donald Moffat] *
                            1 [Harris Yulin] *
                            1 [Miguel Sandoval] *
                            1 [Tim Grimm] *
                            1 [Tom Tammi] *
                            0.8 [James Earl Jones]
                           )

                         = 1.07
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 17 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.12% (2.12 × 1022 overall)
  • This Post (0.12%)
  • Harrison Ford (7.43%)
  • Benjamin Bratt (7.43%)
  • Anne Archer (4.18%)
  • Thora Birch (2.90%)
  • Donald Moffat (2.90%)
  • Miguel Sandoval (2.90%)
  • James Earl Jones (2.32%)
  • Kim Flowers (1.86%)
  • Raymond Cruz (1.86%)
  • Belita Moreno (1.86%)
  • Harris Yulin (1.86%)
  • Dean Jones (1.39%)
  • Tom Tammi (1.05%)
  • Hope Lange (0.12%)
  • Tim Grimm (0.12%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Clear and Present Danger 33.57%Willem Dafoe 26.13%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
5.51% (1.07 overall)
  • This Post (5.51%)
  • Dean Jones (7.35%)
  • Hope Lange (5.51%)
  • Thora Birch (5.51%)
  • Kim Flowers (5.51%)
  • Raymond Cruz (5.51%)
  • Clear and Present Danger (5.51%)
  • Harrison Ford (5.51%)
  • Willem Dafoe (5.51%)
  • Anne Archer (5.51%)
  • Belita Moreno (5.51%)
  • Benjamin Bratt (5.51%)
  • Donald Moffat (5.51%)
  • Harris Yulin (5.51%)
  • Miguel Sandoval (5.51%)
  • Tim Grimm (5.51%)
  • Tom Tammi (5.51%)
  • James Earl Jones (4.41%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Dean Jones ↗
Str: 12Inf: 1.33
Hope Lange ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Thora Birch ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Kim Flowers ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Raymond Cruz ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Clear and Present Danger ↗
Str: 289Inf: 1
Harrison Ford ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Willem Dafoe ↗
Str: 225Inf: 1
Anne Archer ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Belita Moreno ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Benjamin Bratt ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Donald Moffat ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Harris Yulin ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Miguel Sandoval ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Tim Grimm ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tom Tammi ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
James Earl Jones ↗
Str: 20Inf: 0.8
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
James Earl Jones ↗
Str: 20Inf: 0.8
Tom Tammi ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Tim Grimm ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Miguel Sandoval ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Harris Yulin ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Donald Moffat ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Benjamin Bratt ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Belita Moreno ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Anne Archer ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Willem Dafoe ↗
Str: 225Inf: 1
Harrison Ford ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Clear and Present Danger ↗
Str: 289Inf: 1
Raymond Cruz ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Kim Flowers ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Thora Birch ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Hope Lange ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Dean Jones ↗
Str: 12Inf: 1.33

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Clear and Present Danger
Inbound Posts (1)
Clear and Present Danger
Last calculated: Jul 24, 11:54 PM
36

Related Content

Actors

  • Willem Dafoe
  • Tim Grimm
  • Anne Archer
  • Tom Tammi
  • Hope Lange
  • Belita Moreno
  • Dean Jones
  • Thora Birch
  • Benjamin Bratt
  • Kim Flowers
  • Donald Moffat
  • Raymond Cruz
  • Harris Yulin
  • James Earl Jones
  • Harrison Ford
  • Miguel Sandoval

Films

  • Clear and Present Danger