Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Clear and Present Danger
Joaquim de Almeida
James Earl JonesMiguel SandovalDean JonesAnn MagnusonWillem DafoeHarris YulinTim GrimmTom Tammi

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 days ago
Comments: 0

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 6 days ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Hope Lange

Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook
Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.11% of network
(3.21 × 1023)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.11%)
  • Harrison Ford (7.86%)
  • Benjamin Bratt (6.99%)
  • Anne Archer (3.93%)
  • Thora Birch (2.73%)
  • Donald Moffat (2.73%)
  • Miguel Sandoval (2.73%)
  • James Earl Jones (2.18%)
  • Kim Flowers (1.75%)
  • Raymond Cruz (1.75%)
  • Belita Moreno (1.75%)
  • Harris Yulin (1.75%)
  • Joaquim de Almeida (1.31%)
  • Dean Jones (1.31%)
  • Tom Tammi (0.98%)
  • Ann Magnuson (0.11%)
  • Tim Grimm (0.11%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Clear and Present Danger 35.37%Willem Dafoe 24.56%
Influence Score
i
5.10% of network
(1.6)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (5.10%)
  • Joaquim de Almeida (6.81%)
  • Dean Jones (6.81%)
  • Harrison Ford (5.74%)
  • Clear and Present Danger (5.10%)
  • Thora Birch (5.10%)
  • Kim Flowers (5.10%)
  • Raymond Cruz (5.10%)
  • Willem Dafoe (5.10%)
  • Ann Magnuson (5.10%)
  • Anne Archer (5.10%)
  • Belita Moreno (5.10%)
  • Benjamin Bratt (5.10%)
  • Donald Moffat (5.10%)
  • Harris Yulin (5.10%)
  • Miguel Sandoval (5.10%)
  • Tim Grimm (5.10%)
  • Tom Tammi (5.10%)
  • James Earl Jones (4.08%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 18 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 12 [Joaquim de Almeida] *
                            12 [Dean Jones] *
                            72 [Harrison Ford] *
                            324 [Clear and Present Danger] *
                            25 [Thora Birch] *
                            16 [Kim Flowers] *
                            16 [Raymond Cruz] *
                            225 [Willem Dafoe] *
                            1 [Ann Magnuson] *
                            36 [Anne Archer] *
                            16 [Belita Moreno] *
                            64 [Benjamin Bratt] *
                            25 [Donald Moffat] *
                            16 [Harris Yulin] *
                            25 [Miguel Sandoval] *
                            1 [Tim Grimm] *
                            9 [Tom Tammi] *
                            20 [James Earl Jones]
                           )
                         = 3.21 x 10^23

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1.33 [Joaquim de Almeida] *
                            1.33 [Dean Jones] *
                            1.13 [Harrison Ford] *
                            1 [Clear and Present Danger] *
                            1 [Thora Birch] *
                            1 [Kim Flowers] *
                            1 [Raymond Cruz] *
                            1 [Willem Dafoe] *
                            1 [Ann Magnuson] *
                            1 [Anne Archer] *
                            1 [Belita Moreno] *
                            1 [Benjamin Bratt] *
                            1 [Donald Moffat] *
                            1 [Harris Yulin] *
                            1 [Miguel Sandoval] *
                            1 [Tim Grimm] *
                            1 [Tom Tammi] *
                            0.8 [James Earl Jones]
                           )
                         = 1.6
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 18 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.11% (3.21 × 1023 overall)
  • This Post (0.11%)
  • Harrison Ford (7.86%)
  • Benjamin Bratt (6.99%)
  • Anne Archer (3.93%)
  • Thora Birch (2.73%)
  • Donald Moffat (2.73%)
  • Miguel Sandoval (2.73%)
  • James Earl Jones (2.18%)
  • Kim Flowers (1.75%)
  • Raymond Cruz (1.75%)
  • Belita Moreno (1.75%)
  • Harris Yulin (1.75%)
  • Joaquim de Almeida (1.31%)
  • Dean Jones (1.31%)
  • Tom Tammi (0.98%)
  • Ann Magnuson (0.11%)
  • Tim Grimm (0.11%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Clear and Present Danger 35.37%Willem Dafoe 24.56%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
5.10% (1.6 overall)
  • This Post (5.10%)
  • Joaquim de Almeida (6.81%)
  • Dean Jones (6.81%)
  • Harrison Ford (5.74%)
  • Clear and Present Danger (5.10%)
  • Thora Birch (5.10%)
  • Kim Flowers (5.10%)
  • Raymond Cruz (5.10%)
  • Willem Dafoe (5.10%)
  • Ann Magnuson (5.10%)
  • Anne Archer (5.10%)
  • Belita Moreno (5.10%)
  • Benjamin Bratt (5.10%)
  • Donald Moffat (5.10%)
  • Harris Yulin (5.10%)
  • Miguel Sandoval (5.10%)
  • Tim Grimm (5.10%)
  • Tom Tammi (5.10%)
  • James Earl Jones (4.08%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Joaquim de Almeida ↗
Str: 12Inf: 1.33
Dean Jones ↗
Str: 12Inf: 1.33
Harrison Ford ↗
Str: 72Inf: 1.13
Clear and Present Danger ↗
Str: 324Inf: 1
Thora Birch ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Kim Flowers ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Raymond Cruz ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Willem Dafoe ↗
Str: 225Inf: 1
Ann Magnuson ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Anne Archer ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Belita Moreno ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Benjamin Bratt ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Donald Moffat ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Harris Yulin ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Miguel Sandoval ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Tim Grimm ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tom Tammi ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
James Earl Jones ↗
Str: 20Inf: 0.8
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
James Earl Jones ↗
Str: 20Inf: 0.8
Tom Tammi ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Tim Grimm ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Miguel Sandoval ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Harris Yulin ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Donald Moffat ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Benjamin Bratt ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Belita Moreno ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Anne Archer ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Ann Magnuson ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Willem Dafoe ↗
Str: 225Inf: 1
Raymond Cruz ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Kim Flowers ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Thora Birch ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Clear and Present Danger ↗
Str: 324Inf: 1
Harrison Ford ↗
Str: 72Inf: 1.13
Dean Jones ↗
Str: 12Inf: 1.33
Joaquim de Almeida ↗
Str: 12Inf: 1.33

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Clear and Present Danger
Inbound Posts (1)
Clear and Present Danger
Last calculated: Jun 8, 10:05 AM
29

Related Content

Actors

  • Ann Magnuson
  • Miguel Sandoval
  • Anne Archer
  • Tim Grimm
  • Belita Moreno
  • Tom Tammi
  • Thora Birch
  • Benjamin Bratt
  • Dean Jones
  • Kim Flowers
  • Donald Moffat
  • Raymond Cruz
  • Harris Yulin
  • Harrison Ford
  • James Earl Jones
  • Willem Dafoe
  • Joaquim de Almeida

Films

  • Clear and Present Danger