Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Election apportionment diagrams of GribskovPandehave ÅNorth CoastHolløselundTibirke BakkerVejby StrandAggebo HegnHeatherhill

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 18 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 5 days ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Høbjerg Hegn

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
1.39% of network
(64)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (1.39%)
  • Aggebo Hegn (1.39%)
  • Election apportionment diagrams of Gribskov (1.39%)
  • Heatherhill (1.39%)
  • Tibirke Bakker (1.39%)
  • Vejby Strand (1.39%)
  • Holløselund (1.39%)
  • Pandehave Å (1.39%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
North Coast 88.89%
Influence Score
i
11.11% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • North Coast (11.11%)
  • Aggebo Hegn (11.11%)
  • Election apportionment diagrams of Gribskov (11.11%)
  • Heatherhill (11.11%)
  • Tibirke Bakker (11.11%)
  • Vejby Strand (11.11%)
  • Holløselund (11.11%)
  • Pandehave Å (11.11%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 8 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 64 [North Coast] *
                            1 [Aggebo Hegn] *
                            1 [Election apportionment diagrams of Gribskov] *
                            1 [Heatherhill] *
                            1 [Tibirke Bakker] *
                            1 [Vejby Strand] *
                            1 [Holløselund] *
                            1 [Pandehave Å]
                           )

                         = 64

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [North Coast] *
                            1 [Aggebo Hegn] *
                            1 [Election apportionment diagrams of Gribskov] *
                            1 [Heatherhill] *
                            1 [Tibirke Bakker] *
                            1 [Vejby Strand] *
                            1 [Holløselund] *
                            1 [Pandehave Å]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 8 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
1.39% (64 overall)
  • This Post (1.39%)
  • Aggebo Hegn (1.39%)
  • Election apportionment diagrams of Gribskov (1.39%)
  • Heatherhill (1.39%)
  • Tibirke Bakker (1.39%)
  • Vejby Strand (1.39%)
  • Holløselund (1.39%)
  • Pandehave Å (1.39%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
North Coast 88.89%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
11.11% (1 overall)
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • North Coast (11.11%)
  • Aggebo Hegn (11.11%)
  • Election apportionment diagrams of Gribskov (11.11%)
  • Heatherhill (11.11%)
  • Tibirke Bakker (11.11%)
  • Vejby Strand (11.11%)
  • Holløselund (11.11%)
  • Pandehave Å (11.11%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
North Coast ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Aggebo Hegn ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Election apportionment diagrams of Gribskov ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Heatherhill ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tibirke Bakker ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Vejby Strand ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Holløselund ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Pandehave Å ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Pandehave Å ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Holløselund ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Vejby Strand ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tibirke Bakker ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Heatherhill ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Election apportionment diagrams of Gribskov ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Aggebo Hegn ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
North Coast ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
North Coast
Inbound Posts (1)
North Coast
Last calculated: Jun 11, 11:08 AM
17

Related Content

Topics

  • Holløselund
  • Pandehave Å
  • North Coast
  • Aggebo Hegn
  • Election apportionment diagrams of Gribskov
  • Heatherhill
  • Tibirke Bakker
  • Vejby Strand