Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Election apportionment diagrams of GribskovPandehave ÅNorth CoastHolløselundTibirke BakkerHøbjerg HegnAggebo HegnHeatherhill

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 1 day ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 5 days ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Vejby Strand

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Analyzing Network Connections...

Loading Map...

Nearest Locations

  • 📍
    Heatherhill1.0 km away
  • 📍
    Tibirke Bakker6.0 km away
  • 📍
    North Coast6.3 km away
  • 📍
    Aggebo Hegn7.0 km away
  • 📍
    Hillerød Station20.5 km away

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
1.39% of network
(64)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (1.39%)
  • Aggebo Hegn (1.39%)
  • Election apportionment diagrams of Gribskov (1.39%)
  • Heatherhill (1.39%)
  • Tibirke Bakker (1.39%)
  • Høbjerg Hegn (1.39%)
  • Holløselund (1.39%)
  • Pandehave Å (1.39%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
North Coast 88.89%
Influence Score
i
11.11% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • North Coast (11.11%)
  • Aggebo Hegn (11.11%)
  • Election apportionment diagrams of Gribskov (11.11%)
  • Heatherhill (11.11%)
  • Tibirke Bakker (11.11%)
  • Høbjerg Hegn (11.11%)
  • Holløselund (11.11%)
  • Pandehave Å (11.11%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 8 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 64 [North Coast] *
                            1 [Aggebo Hegn] *
                            1 [Election apportionment diagrams of Gribskov] *
                            1 [Heatherhill] *
                            1 [Tibirke Bakker] *
                            1 [Høbjerg Hegn] *
                            1 [Holløselund] *
                            1 [Pandehave Å]
                           )

                         = 64

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [North Coast] *
                            1 [Aggebo Hegn] *
                            1 [Election apportionment diagrams of Gribskov] *
                            1 [Heatherhill] *
                            1 [Tibirke Bakker] *
                            1 [Høbjerg Hegn] *
                            1 [Holløselund] *
                            1 [Pandehave Å]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 8 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
1.39% (64 overall)
  • This Post (1.39%)
  • Aggebo Hegn (1.39%)
  • Election apportionment diagrams of Gribskov (1.39%)
  • Heatherhill (1.39%)
  • Tibirke Bakker (1.39%)
  • Høbjerg Hegn (1.39%)
  • Holløselund (1.39%)
  • Pandehave Å (1.39%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
North Coast 88.89%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
11.11% (1 overall)
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • North Coast (11.11%)
  • Aggebo Hegn (11.11%)
  • Election apportionment diagrams of Gribskov (11.11%)
  • Heatherhill (11.11%)
  • Tibirke Bakker (11.11%)
  • Høbjerg Hegn (11.11%)
  • Holløselund (11.11%)
  • Pandehave Å (11.11%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
North Coast ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Aggebo Hegn ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Election apportionment diagrams of Gribskov ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Heatherhill ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tibirke Bakker ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Høbjerg Hegn ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Holløselund ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Pandehave Å ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Pandehave Å ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Holløselund ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Høbjerg Hegn ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tibirke Bakker ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Heatherhill ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Election apportionment diagrams of Gribskov ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Aggebo Hegn ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
North Coast ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
North Coast
Inbound Posts (1)
North Coast
Last calculated: Jun 12, 12:39 AM
Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark17

Related Content

Topics

  • Tibirke Bakker
  • Høbjerg Hegn
  • Holløselund
  • Pandehave Å
  • North Coast
  • Aggebo Hegn
  • Election apportionment diagrams of Gribskov
  • Heatherhill