Skip to content

Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Election apportionment diagrams of GribskovPandehave ÅHolløselundTibirke BakkerHøbjerg HegnVejby StrandAggebo HegnHeatherhill

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 4 days ago
Comments: 0

Francesca Ladybird
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Matthew Leech
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 1

Jessica
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Darragh Lennon
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Cathal Kennedy
Last login: 3 months ago
Comments: 0

North Coast

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Analyzing Network Connections...

Loading Map...

Nearest Locations

  • 📍
    Aggebo Hegn2.4 km away
  • 📍
    Heatherhill6.2 km away
  • 📍
    Vejby Strand6.3 km away
  • 📍
    Tibirke Bakker7.8 km away
  • 📍
    Hillerød Station14.9 km away

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
88.89% of network
(64)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (88.89%)
  • Aggebo Hegn (1.39%)
  • Election apportionment diagrams of Gribskov (1.39%)
  • Heatherhill (1.39%)
  • Tibirke Bakker (1.39%)
  • Vejby Strand (1.39%)
  • Høbjerg Hegn (1.39%)
  • Holløselund (1.39%)
  • Pandehave Å (1.39%)
Influence Score
i
11.11% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Aggebo Hegn (11.11%)
  • Election apportionment diagrams of Gribskov (11.11%)
  • Heatherhill (11.11%)
  • Tibirke Bakker (11.11%)
  • Vejby Strand (11.11%)
  • Høbjerg Hegn (11.11%)
  • Holløselund (11.11%)
  • Pandehave Å (11.11%)
Direct Connections 16

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 8) = 8
$outbound = max(1, 8) = 8

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 8 * 8 = 64
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 8 / 8 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 8 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 64 *
                           ( 1 [Aggebo Hegn] *
                            1 [Election apportionment diagrams of Gribskov] *
                            1 [Heatherhill] *
                            1 [Tibirke Bakker] *
                            1 [Vejby Strand] *
                            1 [Høbjerg Hegn] *
                            1 [Holløselund] *
                            1 [Pandehave Å]
                           )

                         = 64

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Aggebo Hegn] *
                            1 [Election apportionment diagrams of Gribskov] *
                            1 [Heatherhill] *
                            1 [Tibirke Bakker] *
                            1 [Vejby Strand] *
                            1 [Høbjerg Hegn] *
                            1 [Holløselund] *
                            1 [Pandehave Å]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 8 Tags on post
Inbound 8 Posts tagging this
Connections 8 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 64
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
88.89% (64 overall)
  • This Post (88.89%)
  • Aggebo Hegn (1.39%)
  • Election apportionment diagrams of Gribskov (1.39%)
  • Heatherhill (1.39%)
  • Tibirke Bakker (1.39%)
  • Vejby Strand (1.39%)
  • Høbjerg Hegn (1.39%)
  • Holløselund (1.39%)
  • Pandehave Å (1.39%)
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
11.11% (1 overall)
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Aggebo Hegn (11.11%)
  • Election apportionment diagrams of Gribskov (11.11%)
  • Heatherhill (11.11%)
  • Tibirke Bakker (11.11%)
  • Vejby Strand (11.11%)
  • Høbjerg Hegn (11.11%)
  • Holløselund (11.11%)
  • Pandehave Å (11.11%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Aggebo Hegn ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Election apportionment diagrams of Gribskov ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Heatherhill ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tibirke Bakker ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Vejby Strand ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Høbjerg Hegn ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Holløselund ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Pandehave Å ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Pandehave Å ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Holløselund ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Høbjerg Hegn ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Vejby Strand ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tibirke Bakker ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Heatherhill ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Election apportionment diagrams of Gribskov ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Aggebo Hegn ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (8)
Aggebo Hegn
Election apportionment diagrams of Gribskov
Høbjerg Hegn
Heatherhill
Holløselund
Pandehave Å
Tibirke Bakker
Vejby Strand
Inbound Posts (8)
Aggebo Hegn
Election apportionment diagrams of Gribskov
Heatherhill
Tibirke Bakker
Vejby Strand
Høbjerg Hegn
Holløselund
Pandehave Å
Last calculated: Oct 3, 7:34 PM
Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark19

Related Content

Topics

  • Holløselund
  • Pandehave Å
  • Aggebo Hegn
  • Election apportionment diagrams of Gribskov
  • Heatherhill
  • Tibirke Bakker
  • Vejby Strand
  • Høbjerg Hegn

A Muso community