Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Eurasian SteppeEast AsiaCentral AsiaMacaronesiaPalearcticInner AsiaNorth AsiaPalearctic ecoregionsHolarcticTemperate rainforests

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 1 day ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 4 days ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Temperate coniferous forests

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Related Images

Temperate broadleaf and mixed forests

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.18% of network
(10.22B)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.18%)
  • North Asia (2.93%)
  • Macaronesia (1.65%)
  • Eurasian Steppe (0.73%)
  • Holarctic (0.73%)
  • Inner Asia (0.18%)
  • Palearctic ecoregions (0.18%)
  • Temperate rainforests (0.18%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Central Asia 41.03%East Asia 30.22%Palearctic 21.98%
Influence Score
i
8.54% of network
(1.87)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (8.54%)
  • East Asia (11.65%)
  • Palearctic (10.25%)
  • Central Asia (9.76%)
  • Eurasian Steppe (8.54%)
  • Holarctic (8.54%)
  • Inner Asia (8.54%)
  • Macaronesia (8.54%)
  • North Asia (8.54%)
  • Palearctic ecoregions (8.54%)
  • Temperate rainforests (8.54%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 10 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 165 [East Asia] *
                            120 [Palearctic] *
                            224 [Central Asia] *
                            4 [Eurasian Steppe] *
                            4 [Holarctic] *
                            1 [Inner Asia] *
                            9 [Macaronesia] *
                            16 [North Asia] *
                            1 [Palearctic ecoregions] *
                            1 [Temperate rainforests]
                           )

                         = 10.22B

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1.36 [East Asia] *
                            1.2 [Palearctic] *
                            1.14 [Central Asia] *
                            1 [Eurasian Steppe] *
                            1 [Holarctic] *
                            1 [Inner Asia] *
                            1 [Macaronesia] *
                            1 [North Asia] *
                            1 [Palearctic ecoregions] *
                            1 [Temperate rainforests]
                           )

                         = 1.87
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 10 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.18% (10.22B overall)
  • This Post (0.18%)
  • North Asia (2.93%)
  • Macaronesia (1.65%)
  • Eurasian Steppe (0.73%)
  • Holarctic (0.73%)
  • Inner Asia (0.18%)
  • Palearctic ecoregions (0.18%)
  • Temperate rainforests (0.18%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Central Asia 41.03%East Asia 30.22%Palearctic 21.98%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
8.54% (1.87 overall)
  • This Post (8.54%)
  • East Asia (11.65%)
  • Palearctic (10.25%)
  • Central Asia (9.76%)
  • Eurasian Steppe (8.54%)
  • Holarctic (8.54%)
  • Inner Asia (8.54%)
  • Macaronesia (8.54%)
  • North Asia (8.54%)
  • Palearctic ecoregions (8.54%)
  • Temperate rainforests (8.54%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
East Asia ↗
Str: 165Inf: 1.36
Palearctic ↗
Str: 120Inf: 1.2
Central Asia ↗
Str: 224Inf: 1.14
Eurasian Steppe ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Holarctic ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Inner Asia ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Macaronesia ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
North Asia ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Palearctic ecoregions ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Temperate rainforests ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Temperate rainforests ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Palearctic ecoregions ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
North Asia ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Macaronesia ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Inner Asia ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Holarctic ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Eurasian Steppe ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Central Asia ↗
Str: 224Inf: 1.14
Palearctic ↗
Str: 120Inf: 1.2
East Asia ↗
Str: 165Inf: 1.36

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Palearctic
Inbound Posts (1)
Palearctic
Last calculated: Jun 10, 3:20 PM
31

Related Content

Locations

  • North Asia
  • Palearctic
  • Central Asia
  • East Asia

Topics

  • Macaronesia
  • Palearctic ecoregions
  • Temperate rainforests
  • Eurasian Steppe
  • Holarctic
  • Inner Asia