Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Eurasian SteppeEast AsiaCentral AsiaInner AsiaMacaronesiaPalearcticNorth AsiaPalearctic ecoregionsHolarcticTemperate rainforests

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 14 hours ago
Comments: 0

jacierlogyn
Last login: 5 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Temperate coniferous forests

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Related Images

Temperate broadleaf and mixed forests

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.17% of network
(110.36B)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.17%)
  • North Asia (2.75%)
  • Himalayas (1.55%)
  • Macaronesia (1.55%)
  • Eurasian Steppe (0.69%)
  • Holarctic (0.69%)
  • Inner Asia (0.17%)
  • Palearctic ecoregions (0.17%)
  • Temperate rainforests (0.17%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Central Asia 38.49%East Asia 30.93%Palearctic 22.68%
Influence Score
i
8.01% of network
(1.56)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (8.01%)
  • East Asia (10.01%)
  • Central Asia (9.16%)
  • Palearctic (8.74%)
  • Himalayas (8.01%)
  • Eurasian Steppe (8.01%)
  • Holarctic (8.01%)
  • Inner Asia (8.01%)
  • Macaronesia (8.01%)
  • North Asia (8.01%)
  • Palearctic ecoregions (8.01%)
  • Temperate rainforests (8.01%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 11 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 180 [East Asia] *
                            224 [Central Asia] *
                            132 [Palearctic] *
                            9 [Himalayas] *
                            4 [Eurasian Steppe] *
                            4 [Holarctic] *
                            1 [Inner Asia] *
                            9 [Macaronesia] *
                            16 [North Asia] *
                            1 [Palearctic ecoregions] *
                            1 [Temperate rainforests]
                           )

                         = 110.36B

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1.25 [East Asia] *
                            1.14 [Central Asia] *
                            1.09 [Palearctic] *
                            1 [Himalayas] *
                            1 [Eurasian Steppe] *
                            1 [Holarctic] *
                            1 [Inner Asia] *
                            1 [Macaronesia] *
                            1 [North Asia] *
                            1 [Palearctic ecoregions] *
                            1 [Temperate rainforests]
                           )

                         = 1.56
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 11 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.17% (110.36B overall)
  • This Post (0.17%)
  • North Asia (2.75%)
  • Himalayas (1.55%)
  • Macaronesia (1.55%)
  • Eurasian Steppe (0.69%)
  • Holarctic (0.69%)
  • Inner Asia (0.17%)
  • Palearctic ecoregions (0.17%)
  • Temperate rainforests (0.17%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Central Asia 38.49%East Asia 30.93%Palearctic 22.68%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
8.01% (1.56 overall)
  • This Post (8.01%)
  • East Asia (10.01%)
  • Central Asia (9.16%)
  • Palearctic (8.74%)
  • Himalayas (8.01%)
  • Eurasian Steppe (8.01%)
  • Holarctic (8.01%)
  • Inner Asia (8.01%)
  • Macaronesia (8.01%)
  • North Asia (8.01%)
  • Palearctic ecoregions (8.01%)
  • Temperate rainforests (8.01%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
East Asia ↗
Str: 180Inf: 1.25
Central Asia ↗
Str: 224Inf: 1.14
Palearctic ↗
Str: 132Inf: 1.09
Himalayas ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Eurasian Steppe ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Holarctic ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Inner Asia ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Macaronesia ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
North Asia ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Palearctic ecoregions ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Temperate rainforests ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Temperate rainforests ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Palearctic ecoregions ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
North Asia ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Macaronesia ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Inner Asia ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Holarctic ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Eurasian Steppe ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Himalayas ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Palearctic ↗
Str: 132Inf: 1.09
Central Asia ↗
Str: 224Inf: 1.14
East Asia ↗
Str: 180Inf: 1.25

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Palearctic
Inbound Posts (1)
Palearctic
Last calculated: Jul 4, 4:34 AM
31

Related Content

Figures

  • Himalayas

Locations

  • Central Asia
  • East Asia
  • Palearctic
  • North Asia

Topics

  • Temperate rainforests
  • Eurasian Steppe
  • Holarctic
  • Inner Asia
  • Macaronesia
  • Palearctic ecoregions