Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Eurasian SteppeEast AsiaCentral AsiaSiberiaWestern SiberiaInner AsiaPalearcticMacaronesiaJoyce GiraudTemperate coniferous forests

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 2 days ago
Comments: 0

Darragh Lennon
Last login: 5 days ago
Comments: 0

Cathal Kennedy
Last login: 1 week ago
Comments: 0

jacierlogyn
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

North Asia

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Related Images

Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Temperate broadleaf and mixed forests
Ethnic groups in Siberia

Analyzing Network Connections...

Loading Map...

Nearest Locations

  • 📍
    Siberia294.0 km away
  • 📍
    Collapse of the Soviet Union314.8 km away

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
2.52% of network
(1.53 × 1015)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (2.52%)
  • Siberia (3.77%)
  • Joyce Giraud (2.52%)
  • Himalayas (1.42%)
  • Macaronesia (1.42%)
  • Søren Randrup (1.42%)
  • Eurasian Steppe (0.63%)
  • Holarctic (0.63%)
  • Western Siberia (0.63%)
  • Inner Asia (0.16%)
  • Palearctic ecoregions (0.16%)
  • Temperate coniferous forests (0.16%)
  • Temperate rainforests (0.16%)
  • Musical instruments of North Asia (0.16%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Central Asia 35.22%East Asia 28.30%Palearctic 20.75%
Influence Score
i
5.56% of network
(2.34)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (5.56%)
  • Siberia (8.34%)
  • East Asia (6.95%)
  • Central Asia (6.36%)
  • Palearctic (6.07%)
  • Himalayas (5.56%)
  • Eurasian Steppe (5.56%)
  • Holarctic (5.56%)
  • Inner Asia (5.56%)
  • Macaronesia (5.56%)
  • Palearctic ecoregions (5.56%)
  • Temperate coniferous forests (5.56%)
  • Temperate rainforests (5.56%)
  • Musical instruments of North Asia (5.56%)
  • Western Siberia (5.56%)
  • Søren Randrup (5.56%)
  • Joyce Giraud (5.56%)
Direct Connections 8

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 4) = 4
$outbound = max(1, 4) = 4

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 4 * 4 = 16
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 4 / 4 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 16 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 16 *
                           ( 24 [Siberia] *
                            180 [East Asia] *
                            224 [Central Asia] *
                            132 [Palearctic] *
                            9 [Himalayas] *
                            4 [Eurasian Steppe] *
                            4 [Holarctic] *
                            1 [Inner Asia] *
                            9 [Macaronesia] *
                            1 [Palearctic ecoregions] *
                            1 [Temperate coniferous forests] *
                            1 [Temperate rainforests] *
                            1 [Musical instruments of North Asia] *
                            4 [Western Siberia] *
                            9 [Søren Randrup] *
                            16 [Joyce Giraud]
                           )

                         = 1.53 x 10^15

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1.5 [Siberia] *
                            1.25 [East Asia] *
                            1.14 [Central Asia] *
                            1.09 [Palearctic] *
                            1 [Himalayas] *
                            1 [Eurasian Steppe] *
                            1 [Holarctic] *
                            1 [Inner Asia] *
                            1 [Macaronesia] *
                            1 [Palearctic ecoregions] *
                            1 [Temperate coniferous forests] *
                            1 [Temperate rainforests] *
                            1 [Musical instruments of North Asia] *
                            1 [Western Siberia] *
                            1 [Søren Randrup] *
                            1 [Joyce Giraud]
                           )

                         = 2.34
Outbound 4 Tags on post
Inbound 4 Posts tagging this
Connections 16 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 16
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
2.52% (1.53 × 1015 overall)
  • This Post (2.52%)
  • Siberia (3.77%)
  • Joyce Giraud (2.52%)
  • Himalayas (1.42%)
  • Macaronesia (1.42%)
  • Søren Randrup (1.42%)
  • Eurasian Steppe (0.63%)
  • Holarctic (0.63%)
  • Western Siberia (0.63%)
  • Inner Asia (0.16%)
  • Palearctic ecoregions (0.16%)
  • Temperate coniferous forests (0.16%)
  • Temperate rainforests (0.16%)
  • Musical instruments of North Asia (0.16%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Central Asia 35.22%East Asia 28.30%Palearctic 20.75%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
5.56% (2.34 overall)
  • This Post (5.56%)
  • Siberia (8.34%)
  • East Asia (6.95%)
  • Central Asia (6.36%)
  • Palearctic (6.07%)
  • Himalayas (5.56%)
  • Eurasian Steppe (5.56%)
  • Holarctic (5.56%)
  • Inner Asia (5.56%)
  • Macaronesia (5.56%)
  • Palearctic ecoregions (5.56%)
  • Temperate coniferous forests (5.56%)
  • Temperate rainforests (5.56%)
  • Musical instruments of North Asia (5.56%)
  • Western Siberia (5.56%)
  • Søren Randrup (5.56%)
  • Joyce Giraud (5.56%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Siberia ↗
Str: 24Inf: 1.5
East Asia ↗
Str: 180Inf: 1.25
Central Asia ↗
Str: 224Inf: 1.14
Palearctic ↗
Str: 132Inf: 1.09
Himalayas ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Eurasian Steppe ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Holarctic ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Inner Asia ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Macaronesia ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Palearctic ecoregions ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Temperate coniferous forests ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Temperate rainforests ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Musical instruments of North Asia ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Western Siberia ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Søren Randrup ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Joyce Giraud ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Joyce Giraud ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Søren Randrup ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Western Siberia ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Musical instruments of North Asia ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Temperate rainforests ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Temperate coniferous forests ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Palearctic ecoregions ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Macaronesia ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Inner Asia ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Holarctic ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Eurasian Steppe ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Himalayas ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Palearctic ↗
Str: 132Inf: 1.09
Central Asia ↗
Str: 224Inf: 1.14
East Asia ↗
Str: 180Inf: 1.25
Siberia ↗
Str: 24Inf: 1.5

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (4)
Musical instruments of North Asia
Palearctic
Siberia
Western Siberia
Inbound Posts (4)
Palearctic
Musical instruments of North Asia
Siberia
Western Siberia
Last calculated: Jul 26, 9:31 AM
Evenkiysky Rayon, Russia31

Related Content

Figures

  • Joyce Giraud
  • Himalayas

Locations

  • Siberia
  • Western Siberia
  • Palearctic
  • Central Asia
  • East Asia

Topics

  • Eurasian Steppe
  • Holarctic
  • Inner Asia
  • Søren Randrup
  • Macaronesia
  • Palearctic ecoregions
  • Temperate coniferous forests
  • Temperate rainforests
  • Musical instruments of North Asia