Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Matt MarinelliBorealis (2005-)Ken FobertSean WerlickBorealisSiobhan O’BrianMichael BriguglioTrevor McBrideAiden WatkinsonAurora Borealis

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Jessica
Last login: 1 hour ago
Comments: 0

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 8 hours ago
Comments: 0

Darragh Lennon
Last login: 1 week ago
Comments: 0

Cathal Kennedy
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

jacierlogyn
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Sean Dowell

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.83% of network
(110)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.83%)
  • Borealis (2005-) (0.83%)
  • Aurora Borealis (0.83%)
  • Aiden Watkinson (0.83%)
  • Ken Fobert (0.83%)
  • Matt Marinelli (0.83%)
  • Michael Briguglio (0.83%)
  • Sean Werlick (0.83%)
  • Siobhan O'Brian (0.83%)
  • Trevor McBride (0.83%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Borealis 91.67%
Influence Score
i
9.01% of network
(1.1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (9.01%)
  • Borealis (9.91%)
  • Borealis (2005-) (9.01%)
  • Aurora Borealis (9.01%)
  • Aiden Watkinson (9.01%)
  • Ken Fobert (9.01%)
  • Matt Marinelli (9.01%)
  • Michael Briguglio (9.01%)
  • Sean Werlick (9.01%)
  • Siobhan O'Brian (9.01%)
  • Trevor McBride (9.01%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 10 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 110 [Borealis] *
                            1 [Borealis (2005-)] *
                            1 [Aurora Borealis] *
                            1 [Aiden Watkinson] *
                            1 [Ken Fobert] *
                            1 [Matt Marinelli] *
                            1 [Michael Briguglio] *
                            1 [Sean Werlick] *
                            1 [Siobhan O'Brian] *
                            1 [Trevor McBride]
                           )

                         = 110

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1.1 [Borealis] *
                            1 [Borealis (2005-)] *
                            1 [Aurora Borealis] *
                            1 [Aiden Watkinson] *
                            1 [Ken Fobert] *
                            1 [Matt Marinelli] *
                            1 [Michael Briguglio] *
                            1 [Sean Werlick] *
                            1 [Siobhan O'Brian] *
                            1 [Trevor McBride]
                           )

                         = 1.1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 10 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.83% (110 overall)
  • This Post (0.83%)
  • Borealis (2005-) (0.83%)
  • Aurora Borealis (0.83%)
  • Aiden Watkinson (0.83%)
  • Ken Fobert (0.83%)
  • Matt Marinelli (0.83%)
  • Michael Briguglio (0.83%)
  • Sean Werlick (0.83%)
  • Siobhan O'Brian (0.83%)
  • Trevor McBride (0.83%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Borealis 91.67%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
9.01% (1.1 overall)
  • This Post (9.01%)
  • Borealis (9.91%)
  • Borealis (2005-) (9.01%)
  • Aurora Borealis (9.01%)
  • Aiden Watkinson (9.01%)
  • Ken Fobert (9.01%)
  • Matt Marinelli (9.01%)
  • Michael Briguglio (9.01%)
  • Sean Werlick (9.01%)
  • Siobhan O'Brian (9.01%)
  • Trevor McBride (9.01%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Borealis ↗
Str: 110Inf: 1.1
Borealis (2005-) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Aurora Borealis ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Aiden Watkinson ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ken Fobert ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Matt Marinelli ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Michael Briguglio ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Sean Werlick ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Siobhan O'Brian ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Trevor McBride ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Trevor McBride ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Siobhan O'Brian ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Sean Werlick ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Michael Briguglio ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Matt Marinelli ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ken Fobert ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Aiden Watkinson ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Aurora Borealis ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Borealis (2005-) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Borealis ↗
Str: 110Inf: 1.1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Borealis
Inbound Posts (1)
Borealis
Last calculated: Jul 29, 10:32 PM
18

Related Content

Figures

  • Sean Werlick
  • Trevor McBride
  • Ken Fobert

Topics

  • Michael Briguglio
  • Borealis (2005-)
  • Siobhan O’Brian
  • Aurora Borealis
  • Borealis
  • Aiden Watkinson
  • Matt Marinelli