Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Matt MarinelliSean WerlickKen FobertBorealisSiobhan O’BrianMichael BriguglioSean DowellTrevor McBrideAiden WatkinsonAurora Borealis

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 12 hours ago
Comments: 0

Darragh Lennon
Last login: 1 week ago
Comments: 0

Cathal Kennedy
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

jacierlogyn
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Borealis (2005-)

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.83% of network
(110)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.83%)
  • Aurora Borealis (0.83%)
  • Aiden Watkinson (0.83%)
  • Ken Fobert (0.83%)
  • Matt Marinelli (0.83%)
  • Michael Briguglio (0.83%)
  • Sean Dowell (0.83%)
  • Sean Werlick (0.83%)
  • Siobhan O'Brian (0.83%)
  • Trevor McBride (0.83%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Borealis 91.67%
Influence Score
i
9.01% of network
(1.1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (9.01%)
  • Borealis (9.91%)
  • Aurora Borealis (9.01%)
  • Aiden Watkinson (9.01%)
  • Ken Fobert (9.01%)
  • Matt Marinelli (9.01%)
  • Michael Briguglio (9.01%)
  • Sean Dowell (9.01%)
  • Sean Werlick (9.01%)
  • Siobhan O'Brian (9.01%)
  • Trevor McBride (9.01%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 10 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 110 [Borealis] *
                            1 [Aurora Borealis] *
                            1 [Aiden Watkinson] *
                            1 [Ken Fobert] *
                            1 [Matt Marinelli] *
                            1 [Michael Briguglio] *
                            1 [Sean Dowell] *
                            1 [Sean Werlick] *
                            1 [Siobhan O'Brian] *
                            1 [Trevor McBride]
                           )

                         = 110

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1.1 [Borealis] *
                            1 [Aurora Borealis] *
                            1 [Aiden Watkinson] *
                            1 [Ken Fobert] *
                            1 [Matt Marinelli] *
                            1 [Michael Briguglio] *
                            1 [Sean Dowell] *
                            1 [Sean Werlick] *
                            1 [Siobhan O'Brian] *
                            1 [Trevor McBride]
                           )

                         = 1.1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 10 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.83% (110 overall)
  • This Post (0.83%)
  • Aurora Borealis (0.83%)
  • Aiden Watkinson (0.83%)
  • Ken Fobert (0.83%)
  • Matt Marinelli (0.83%)
  • Michael Briguglio (0.83%)
  • Sean Dowell (0.83%)
  • Sean Werlick (0.83%)
  • Siobhan O'Brian (0.83%)
  • Trevor McBride (0.83%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Borealis 91.67%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
9.01% (1.1 overall)
  • This Post (9.01%)
  • Borealis (9.91%)
  • Aurora Borealis (9.01%)
  • Aiden Watkinson (9.01%)
  • Ken Fobert (9.01%)
  • Matt Marinelli (9.01%)
  • Michael Briguglio (9.01%)
  • Sean Dowell (9.01%)
  • Sean Werlick (9.01%)
  • Siobhan O'Brian (9.01%)
  • Trevor McBride (9.01%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Borealis ↗
Str: 110Inf: 1.1
Aurora Borealis ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Aiden Watkinson ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ken Fobert ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Matt Marinelli ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Michael Briguglio ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Sean Dowell ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Sean Werlick ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Siobhan O'Brian ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Trevor McBride ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Trevor McBride ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Siobhan O'Brian ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Sean Werlick ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Sean Dowell ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Michael Briguglio ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Matt Marinelli ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ken Fobert ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Aiden Watkinson ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Aurora Borealis ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Borealis ↗
Str: 110Inf: 1.1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Borealis
Inbound Posts (1)
Borealis
Last calculated: Jul 29, 7:21 AM
44

Related Content

Figures

  • Sean Werlick
  • Trevor McBride
  • Ken Fobert

Topics

  • Matt Marinelli
  • Michael Briguglio
  • Sean Dowell
  • Borealis
  • Siobhan O’Brian
  • Aurora Borealis
  • Aiden Watkinson