Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

1929–1930 Massachusetts legislatureEliot WadsworthJohn E. Powers1920 Massachusetts legislature1945–1946 Massachusetts legislatureMarion Cowan BurrowsAdolph Johnson

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 2 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Henry Lee Shattuck

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
23.68% of network
(3.9K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (23.68%)
  • 1929–1930 Massachusetts legislature (23.68%)
  • Adolph Johnson (10.53%)
  • 1920 Massachusetts legislature (2.63%)
  • Eliot Wadsworth (2.63%)
  • Marion Cowan Burrows (2.63%)
  • John E. Powers (2.63%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
1945–1946 Massachusetts legislature 31.58%
Influence Score
i
12.00% of network
(1.33)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (12.00%)
  • 1945–1946 Massachusetts legislature (16.00%)
  • 1920 Massachusetts legislature (12.00%)
  • 1929–1930 Massachusetts legislature (12.00%)
  • Eliot Wadsworth (12.00%)
  • Marion Cowan Burrows (12.00%)
  • Adolph Johnson (12.00%)
  • John E. Powers (12.00%)
Direct Connections 6

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 3) = 3
$outbound = max(1, 3) = 3

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 3 * 3 = 9
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 3 / 3 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 7 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 9 *
                           ( 12 [1945–1946 Massachusetts legislature] *
                            1 [1920 Massachusetts legislature] *
                            9 [1929–1930 Massachusetts legislature] *
                            1 [Eliot Wadsworth] *
                            1 [Marion Cowan Burrows] *
                            4 [Adolph Johnson] *
                            1 [John E. Powers]
                           )

                         = 3.9K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1.33 [1945–1946 Massachusetts legislature] *
                            1 [1920 Massachusetts legislature] *
                            1 [1929–1930 Massachusetts legislature] *
                            1 [Eliot Wadsworth] *
                            1 [Marion Cowan Burrows] *
                            1 [Adolph Johnson] *
                            1 [John E. Powers]
                           )

                         = 1.33
Outbound 3 Tags on post
Inbound 3 Posts tagging this
Connections 7 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 9
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
23.68% (3.9K overall)
  • This Post (23.68%)
  • 1929–1930 Massachusetts legislature (23.68%)
  • Adolph Johnson (10.53%)
  • 1920 Massachusetts legislature (2.63%)
  • Eliot Wadsworth (2.63%)
  • Marion Cowan Burrows (2.63%)
  • John E. Powers (2.63%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
1945–1946 Massachusetts legislature 31.58%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
12.00% (1.33 overall)
  • This Post (12.00%)
  • 1945–1946 Massachusetts legislature (16.00%)
  • 1920 Massachusetts legislature (12.00%)
  • 1929–1930 Massachusetts legislature (12.00%)
  • Eliot Wadsworth (12.00%)
  • Marion Cowan Burrows (12.00%)
  • Adolph Johnson (12.00%)
  • John E. Powers (12.00%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
1945–1946 Massachusetts legislature ↗
Str: 12Inf: 1.33
1920 Massachusetts legislature ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
1929–1930 Massachusetts legislature ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Eliot Wadsworth ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Marion Cowan Burrows ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Adolph Johnson ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
John E. Powers ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
John E. Powers ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Adolph Johnson ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Marion Cowan Burrows ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Eliot Wadsworth ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
1929–1930 Massachusetts legislature ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
1920 Massachusetts legislature ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
1945–1946 Massachusetts legislature ↗
Str: 12Inf: 1.33

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (3)
1920 Massachusetts legislature
1929–1930 Massachusetts legislature
1945–1946 Massachusetts legislature
Inbound Posts (3)
1920 Massachusetts legislature
1929–1930 Massachusetts legislature
1945–1946 Massachusetts legislature
Last calculated: Jun 18, 12:55 AM
7

Related Content

Topics

  • Eliot Wadsworth
  • Marion Cowan Burrows
  • 1945–1946 Massachusetts legislature
  • Adolph Johnson
  • John E. Powers
  • 1920 Massachusetts legislature
  • 1929–1930 Massachusetts legislature