Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

1935–1936 Massachusetts legislature1929–1930 Massachusetts legislatureJohn E. Powers1920 Massachusetts legislatureHollis GottHenry Lee ShattuckAdolph Johnson

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 2 hours ago
Comments: 0

jacierlogyn
Last login: 2 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

1945–1946 Massachusetts legislature

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
25.53% of network
(70K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (25.53%)
  • Henry Lee Shattuck (19.15%)
  • 1929–1930 Massachusetts legislature (19.15%)
  • 1935–1936 Massachusetts legislature (19.15%)
  • Adolph Johnson (8.51%)
  • Hollis Gott (4.26%)
  • John E. Powers (2.13%)
  • 1920 Massachusetts legislature (2.13%)
Influence Score
i
17.02% of network
(0.6667)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (17.02%)
  • Henry Lee Shattuck (12.77%)
  • Adolph Johnson (12.77%)
  • John E. Powers (12.77%)
  • 1920 Massachusetts legislature (12.77%)
  • 1929–1930 Massachusetts legislature (12.77%)
  • 1935–1936 Massachusetts legislature (12.77%)
  • Hollis Gott (6.38%)
Direct Connections 7

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 4) = 4
$outbound = max(1, 3) = 3

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 4 * 3 = 12
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 4 / 3 = 1.3333

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 7 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 12 *
                           ( 9 [Henry Lee Shattuck] *
                            4 [Adolph Johnson] *
                            1 [John E. Powers] *
                            1 [1920 Massachusetts legislature] *
                            9 [1929–1930 Massachusetts legislature] *
                            9 [1935–1936 Massachusetts legislature] *
                            2 [Hollis Gott]
                           )

                         = 70K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1.3333 *
                           ( 1 [Henry Lee Shattuck] *
                            1 [Adolph Johnson] *
                            1 [John E. Powers] *
                            1 [1920 Massachusetts legislature] *
                            1 [1929–1930 Massachusetts legislature] *
                            1 [1935–1936 Massachusetts legislature] *
                            0.5 [Hollis Gott]
                           )

                         = 0.6667
Outbound 4 Tags on post
Inbound 3 Posts tagging this
Connections 7 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 12
Base Node Influence 1.3333
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
25.53% (70K overall)
  • This Post (25.53%)
  • Henry Lee Shattuck (19.15%)
  • 1929–1930 Massachusetts legislature (19.15%)
  • 1935–1936 Massachusetts legislature (19.15%)
  • Adolph Johnson (8.51%)
  • Hollis Gott (4.26%)
  • John E. Powers (2.13%)
  • 1920 Massachusetts legislature (2.13%)
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
17.02% (0.6667 overall)
  • This Post (17.02%)
  • Henry Lee Shattuck (12.77%)
  • Adolph Johnson (12.77%)
  • John E. Powers (12.77%)
  • 1920 Massachusetts legislature (12.77%)
  • 1929–1930 Massachusetts legislature (12.77%)
  • 1935–1936 Massachusetts legislature (12.77%)
  • Hollis Gott (6.38%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Henry Lee Shattuck ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Adolph Johnson ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
John E. Powers ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
1920 Massachusetts legislature ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
1929–1930 Massachusetts legislature ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
1935–1936 Massachusetts legislature ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Hollis Gott ↗
Str: 2Inf: 0.5
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Hollis Gott ↗
Str: 2Inf: 0.5
1935–1936 Massachusetts legislature ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
1929–1930 Massachusetts legislature ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
1920 Massachusetts legislature ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
John E. Powers ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Adolph Johnson ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Henry Lee Shattuck ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (4)
Adolph Johnson
Henry Lee Shattuck
Hollis Gott
BROKEN LINK
John E. Powers
Inbound Posts (3)
Henry Lee Shattuck
Adolph Johnson
John E. Powers
Last calculated: Jun 30, 8:52 PM
9

Related Content

Topics

  • Henry Lee Shattuck
  • Adolph Johnson
  • John E. Powers
  • 1920 Massachusetts legislature
  • 1929–1930 Massachusetts legislature
  • 1935–1936 Massachusetts legislature
  • Hollis Gott