Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Romania
Arad
Bucharest
Dâmbovița
Brașov
Cluj
Constanța
Tulcea
Galați
Giurgiu

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Francesca Ladybird
Last login: 2 days ago
Comments: 0

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 5 days ago
Comments: 0

Matthew Leech
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 1

Jessica
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Darragh Lennon
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Cathal Kennedy
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Sălaj

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Related Images

Cluj
Giurgiu
Argeș
Constanța
Brăila
Bucharest
Galați
Dâmbovița
Arad
Tulcea
Brașov

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.53% of network
(2K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.53%)
  • Bucharest (3.19%)
  • Argeș (1.06%)
  • Arad (0.53%)
  • Brăila (0.53%)
  • Brașov (0.53%)
  • Cluj (0.53%)
  • Constanța (0.53%)
  • Dâmbovița (0.53%)
  • Galați (0.53%)
  • Giurgiu (0.53%)
  • Prahova (0.53%)
  • Tulcea (0.53%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Romania 89.89%
Influence Score
i
6.82% of network
(1.33)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (6.82%)
  • Argeș (13.64%)
  • Romania (6.82%)
  • Arad (6.82%)
  • Brăila (6.82%)
  • Brașov (6.82%)
  • Cluj (6.82%)
  • Constanța (6.82%)
  • Dâmbovița (6.82%)
  • Galați (6.82%)
  • Giurgiu (6.82%)
  • Prahova (6.82%)
  • Tulcea (6.82%)
  • Bucharest (4.55%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 13 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 2 [Argeș] *
                            169 [Romania] *
                            1 [Arad] *
                            1 [Brăila] *
                            1 [Brașov] *
                            1 [Cluj] *
                            1 [Constanța] *
                            1 [Dâmbovița] *
                            1 [Galați] *
                            1 [Giurgiu] *
                            1 [Prahova] *
                            1 [Tulcea] *
                            6 [Bucharest]
                           )

                         = 2K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 2 [Argeș] *
                            1 [Romania] *
                            1 [Arad] *
                            1 [Brăila] *
                            1 [Brașov] *
                            1 [Cluj] *
                            1 [Constanța] *
                            1 [Dâmbovița] *
                            1 [Galați] *
                            1 [Giurgiu] *
                            1 [Prahova] *
                            1 [Tulcea] *
                            0.6667 [Bucharest]
                           )

                         = 1.33
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 13 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.53% (2K overall)
  • This Post (0.53%)
  • Bucharest (3.19%)
  • Argeș (1.06%)
  • Arad (0.53%)
  • Brăila (0.53%)
  • Brașov (0.53%)
  • Cluj (0.53%)
  • Constanța (0.53%)
  • Dâmbovița (0.53%)
  • Galați (0.53%)
  • Giurgiu (0.53%)
  • Prahova (0.53%)
  • Tulcea (0.53%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Romania 89.89%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
6.82% (1.33 overall)
  • This Post (6.82%)
  • Argeș (13.64%)
  • Romania (6.82%)
  • Arad (6.82%)
  • Brăila (6.82%)
  • Brașov (6.82%)
  • Cluj (6.82%)
  • Constanța (6.82%)
  • Dâmbovița (6.82%)
  • Galați (6.82%)
  • Giurgiu (6.82%)
  • Prahova (6.82%)
  • Tulcea (6.82%)
  • Bucharest (4.55%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Argeș ↗
Str: 2Inf: 2
Romania ↗
Str: 169Inf: 1
Arad ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Brăila ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Brașov ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Cluj ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Constanța ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Dâmbovița ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Galați ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Giurgiu ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Prahova ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tulcea ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Bucharest ↗
Str: 6Inf: 0.6667
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Bucharest ↗
Str: 6Inf: 0.6667
Tulcea ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Prahova ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Giurgiu ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Galați ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Dâmbovița ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Constanța ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Cluj ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Brașov ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Brăila ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Arad ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Romania ↗
Str: 169Inf: 1
Argeș ↗
Str: 2Inf: 2

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
romania
Inbound Posts (1)
Romania
Last calculated: Sep 2, 5:51 PM
20

Related Content

Nations

  • Romania

Regionals

  • Argeș
  • Giurgiu
  • Brăila
  • Prahova
  • Brașov
  • Tulcea
  • Bucharest
  • Cluj
  • Constanța
  • Dâmbovița
  • Arad
  • Galați