Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Arad
Bucharest
BucureștiRoyal Palace
Dâmbovița
Brașov
Cluj
Constanța
Giurgiu
Tulcea

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 17 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 1 week ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Romania

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Related Images

Dâmbovița
Bucharest
Tulcea
National Archives, Bucharest
Arad
Objects in Bucharest
Cluj
Constanța
Galați
Romanian typhus outbreak during WWI
Brăila
Brașov
Argeș
Royal Palace, Bucharest
Giurgiu

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
47.34% of network
(1.34M)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (47.34%)
  • Bucharest (1.68%)
  • Argeș (0.56%)
  • Anthony Burr (0.56%)
  • București (0.56%)
  • Arad (0.28%)
  • Brăila (0.28%)
  • Brașov (0.28%)
  • Cluj (0.28%)
  • Constanța (0.28%)
  • Dâmbovița (0.28%)
  • Galați (0.28%)
  • Giurgiu (0.28%)
  • Prahova (0.28%)
  • Sălaj (0.28%)
  • Tulcea (0.28%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Royal Palace 46.22%
Influence Score
i
5.40% of network
(1.82)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (5.40%)
  • Argeș (10.79%)
  • București (10.79%)
  • Royal Palace (7.36%)
  • Arad (5.40%)
  • Brăila (5.40%)
  • Brașov (5.40%)
  • Cluj (5.40%)
  • Constanța (5.40%)
  • Dâmbovița (5.40%)
  • Galați (5.40%)
  • Giurgiu (5.40%)
  • Prahova (5.40%)
  • Sălaj (5.40%)
  • Tulcea (5.40%)
  • Bucharest (3.60%)
  • Anthony Burr (2.70%)
Direct Connections 26

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 13) = 13
$outbound = max(1, 13) = 13

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 13 * 13 = 169
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 13 / 13 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 16 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 169 *
                           ( 2 [Argeș] *
                            2 [București] *
                            165 [Royal Palace] *
                            1 [Arad] *
                            1 [Brăila] *
                            1 [Brașov] *
                            1 [Cluj] *
                            1 [Constanța] *
                            1 [Dâmbovița] *
                            1 [Galați] *
                            1 [Giurgiu] *
                            1 [Prahova] *
                            1 [Sălaj] *
                            1 [Tulcea] *
                            6 [Bucharest] *
                            2 [Anthony Burr]
                           )

                         = 1.34M

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 2 [Argeș] *
                            2 [București] *
                            1.36 [Royal Palace] *
                            1 [Arad] *
                            1 [Brăila] *
                            1 [Brașov] *
                            1 [Cluj] *
                            1 [Constanța] *
                            1 [Dâmbovița] *
                            1 [Galați] *
                            1 [Giurgiu] *
                            1 [Prahova] *
                            1 [Sălaj] *
                            1 [Tulcea] *
                            0.6667 [Bucharest] *
                            0.5 [Anthony Burr]
                           )

                         = 1.82
Outbound 13 Tags on post
Inbound 13 Posts tagging this
Connections 16 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 169
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
47.34% (1.34M overall)
  • This Post (47.34%)
  • Bucharest (1.68%)
  • Argeș (0.56%)
  • Anthony Burr (0.56%)
  • București (0.56%)
  • Arad (0.28%)
  • Brăila (0.28%)
  • Brașov (0.28%)
  • Cluj (0.28%)
  • Constanța (0.28%)
  • Dâmbovița (0.28%)
  • Galați (0.28%)
  • Giurgiu (0.28%)
  • Prahova (0.28%)
  • Sălaj (0.28%)
  • Tulcea (0.28%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Royal Palace 46.22%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
5.40% (1.82 overall)
  • This Post (5.40%)
  • Argeș (10.79%)
  • București (10.79%)
  • Royal Palace (7.36%)
  • Arad (5.40%)
  • Brăila (5.40%)
  • Brașov (5.40%)
  • Cluj (5.40%)
  • Constanța (5.40%)
  • Dâmbovița (5.40%)
  • Galați (5.40%)
  • Giurgiu (5.40%)
  • Prahova (5.40%)
  • Sălaj (5.40%)
  • Tulcea (5.40%)
  • Bucharest (3.60%)
  • Anthony Burr (2.70%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Argeș ↗
Str: 2Inf: 2
București ↗
Str: 2Inf: 2
Royal Palace ↗
Str: 165Inf: 1.36
Arad ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Brăila ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Brașov ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Cluj ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Constanța ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Dâmbovița ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Galați ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Giurgiu ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Prahova ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Sălaj ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tulcea ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Bucharest ↗
Str: 6Inf: 0.6667
Anthony Burr ↗
Str: 2Inf: 0.5
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Anthony Burr ↗
Str: 2Inf: 0.5
Bucharest ↗
Str: 6Inf: 0.6667
Tulcea ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Sălaj ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Prahova ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Giurgiu ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Galați ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Dâmbovița ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Constanța ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Cluj ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Brașov ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Brăila ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Arad ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Royal Palace ↗
Str: 165Inf: 1.36
București ↗
Str: 2Inf: 2
Argeș ↗
Str: 2Inf: 2

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (13)
Anthony Burr
BROKEN LINK
Arad
Brașov
Brăila
Bucharest
Cluj
Constanța
Dâmbovița
Galați
Giurgiu
Prahova
Sălaj
Tulcea
Inbound Posts (13)
Arad
Argeș
BROKEN LINK
Brăila
Brașov
Bucharest
Cluj
Constanța
Dâmbovița
Galați
Giurgiu
Prahova
Sălaj
Tulcea
Last calculated: Jun 16, 11:44 AM
Turkmensky District, Romania189

Related Content

Figures

  • Anthony Burr

Locations

  • București
  • Royal Palace

Regionals

  • Argeș
  • Cluj
  • Constanța
  • Arad
  • Dâmbovița
  • Brăila
  • Galați
  • Brașov
  • Giurgiu
  • Bucharest
  • Prahova
  • Sălaj
  • Tulcea