Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Clint BoonBaggy
Inspiral Carpets
The Inspiral Carpets
Graham Lambert
Martyn Walsh
Steve HanleyStephen HoltThe Lovers (2)David Swift

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 8 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Tom Hingley

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Craig Gill
  • Graham Lambert
    Graham Lambert band photo
  • Inspiral Carpets
    Inspiral Carpets band photo
  • Martyn Walsh
    Martyn Walsh band photo
  • The Inspiral Carpets
    The Inspiral Carpets band photo
  • The Lovers (2)
  • Tom Hingley Band
  • Too Much Texas

Connected Musicians

  • Baggy
  • Chris Goodwin
  • Clint Boon
  • David Swift
  • Mark Hughes (19)
  • Stephen Holt
  • Steve Hanley

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
8.55% of network
(1.07 × 1020)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (8.55%)
  • Inspiral Carpets (17.45%)
  • Graham Lambert (17.45%)
  • Martyn Walsh (17.45%)
  • The Inspiral Carpets (14.14%)
  • Clint Boon (4.36%)
  • Stephen Holt (2.79%)
  • Chris Goodwin (2.79%)
  • Craig Gill (2.79%)
  • David Swift (2.79%)
  • Mark Hughes (19) (2.79%)
  • Baggy (2.79%)
  • Steve Hanley (2.79%)
  • The Lovers (2) (0.70%)
  • Tom Hingley Band (0.17%)
  • Too Much Texas (0.17%)
Influence Score
i
6.25% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (6.25%)
  • Inspiral Carpets (6.25%)
  • Clint Boon (6.25%)
  • Graham Lambert (6.25%)
  • Martyn Walsh (6.25%)
  • Stephen Holt (6.25%)
  • Chris Goodwin (6.25%)
  • Craig Gill (6.25%)
  • David Swift (6.25%)
  • Mark Hughes (19) (6.25%)
  • Baggy (6.25%)
  • The Inspiral Carpets (6.25%)
  • The Lovers (2) (6.25%)
  • Tom Hingley Band (6.25%)
  • Too Much Texas (6.25%)
  • Steve Hanley (6.25%)
Direct Connections 14

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 7) = 7
$outbound = max(1, 7) = 7

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 7 * 7 = 49
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 7 / 7 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 15 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 49 *
                           ( 100 [Inspiral Carpets] *
                            25 [Clint Boon] *
                            100 [Graham Lambert] *
                            100 [Martyn Walsh] *
                            16 [Stephen Holt] *
                            16 [Chris Goodwin] *
                            16 [Craig Gill] *
                            16 [David Swift] *
                            16 [Mark Hughes (19)] *
                            16 [Baggy] *
                            81 [The Inspiral Carpets] *
                            4 [The Lovers (2)] *
                            1 [Tom Hingley Band] *
                            1 [Too Much Texas] *
                            16 [Steve Hanley]
                           )

                         = 1.07 x 10^20

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Inspiral Carpets] *
                            1 [Clint Boon] *
                            1 [Graham Lambert] *
                            1 [Martyn Walsh] *
                            1 [Stephen Holt] *
                            1 [Chris Goodwin] *
                            1 [Craig Gill] *
                            1 [David Swift] *
                            1 [Mark Hughes (19)] *
                            1 [Baggy] *
                            1 [The Inspiral Carpets] *
                            1 [The Lovers (2)] *
                            1 [Tom Hingley Band] *
                            1 [Too Much Texas] *
                            1 [Steve Hanley]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 7 Tags on post
Inbound 7 Posts tagging this
Connections 15 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 49
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
8.55% (1.07 × 1020 overall)
  • This Post (8.55%)
  • Inspiral Carpets (17.45%)
  • Graham Lambert (17.45%)
  • Martyn Walsh (17.45%)
  • The Inspiral Carpets (14.14%)
  • Clint Boon (4.36%)
  • Stephen Holt (2.79%)
  • Chris Goodwin (2.79%)
  • Craig Gill (2.79%)
  • David Swift (2.79%)
  • Mark Hughes (19) (2.79%)
  • Baggy (2.79%)
  • Steve Hanley (2.79%)
  • The Lovers (2) (0.70%)
  • Tom Hingley Band (0.17%)
  • Too Much Texas (0.17%)
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
6.25% (1 overall)
  • This Post (6.25%)
  • Inspiral Carpets (6.25%)
  • Clint Boon (6.25%)
  • Graham Lambert (6.25%)
  • Martyn Walsh (6.25%)
  • Stephen Holt (6.25%)
  • Chris Goodwin (6.25%)
  • Craig Gill (6.25%)
  • David Swift (6.25%)
  • Mark Hughes (19) (6.25%)
  • Baggy (6.25%)
  • The Inspiral Carpets (6.25%)
  • The Lovers (2) (6.25%)
  • Tom Hingley Band (6.25%)
  • Too Much Texas (6.25%)
  • Steve Hanley (6.25%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Inspiral Carpets ↗
Str: 100Inf: 1
Clint Boon ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Graham Lambert ↗
Str: 100Inf: 1
Martyn Walsh ↗
Str: 100Inf: 1
Stephen Holt ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Chris Goodwin ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Craig Gill ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
David Swift ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Mark Hughes (19) ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Baggy ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
The Inspiral Carpets ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1
The Lovers (2) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Tom Hingley Band ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Too Much Texas ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Steve Hanley ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Steve Hanley ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Too Much Texas ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tom Hingley Band ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
The Lovers (2) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
The Inspiral Carpets ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1
Baggy ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Mark Hughes (19) ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
David Swift ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Craig Gill ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Chris Goodwin ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Stephen Holt ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Martyn Walsh ↗
Str: 100Inf: 1
Graham Lambert ↗
Str: 100Inf: 1
Clint Boon ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Inspiral Carpets ↗
Str: 100Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (7)
Graham Lambert
Inspiral Carpets
Martyn Walsh
The Inspiral Carpets
The Lovers (2)
Tom Hingley Band
Too Much Texas
Inbound Posts (7)
Inspiral Carpets
Graham Lambert
Martyn Walsh
The Inspiral Carpets
The Lovers (2)
Tom Hingley Band
Too Much Texas
Last calculated: Jun 22, 12:13 AM
45

Related Content

No related content found.