Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Clint BoonBaggy
Tom Hingley
Inspiral Carpets
The Inspiral Carpets
Graham Lambert
Stephen HoltThe Lovers (2)Craig GillDavid Swift

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 4 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Martyn Walsh

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Craig Gill
  • Graham Lambert
    Graham Lambert band photo
  • Inspiral Carpets
    Inspiral Carpets band photo
  • The Clint Boon Experience
  • The Inspiral Carpets
    The Inspiral Carpets band photo
  • The Lovers (2)
  • Tom Hingley Band
  • Too Much Texas

Connected Musicians

  • Baggy
  • Chris Goodwin
  • Clint Boon
  • David Swift
  • Mark Hughes (19)
  • Stephen Holt
  • Tom Hingley
    Tom Hingley band photo

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
17.18% of network
(1.66 × 1020)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (17.18%)
  • Inspiral Carpets (17.18%)
  • Graham Lambert (17.18%)
  • The Inspiral Carpets (13.92%)
  • Tom Hingley (8.42%)
  • Clint Boon (4.30%)
  • The Clint Boon Experience (4.30%)
  • Stephen Holt (2.75%)
  • Chris Goodwin (2.75%)
  • Craig Gill (2.75%)
  • David Swift (2.75%)
  • Mark Hughes (19) (2.75%)
  • Baggy (2.75%)
  • The Lovers (2) (0.69%)
  • Tom Hingley Band (0.17%)
  • Too Much Texas (0.17%)
Influence Score
i
6.25% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (6.25%)
  • Inspiral Carpets (6.25%)
  • Clint Boon (6.25%)
  • Graham Lambert (6.25%)
  • Stephen Holt (6.25%)
  • Tom Hingley (6.25%)
  • Chris Goodwin (6.25%)
  • Craig Gill (6.25%)
  • David Swift (6.25%)
  • Mark Hughes (19) (6.25%)
  • Baggy (6.25%)
  • The Inspiral Carpets (6.25%)
  • The Lovers (2) (6.25%)
  • Tom Hingley Band (6.25%)
  • Too Much Texas (6.25%)
  • The Clint Boon Experience (6.25%)
Direct Connections 20

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 10) = 10
$outbound = max(1, 10) = 10

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 10 * 10 = 100
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 10 / 10 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 15 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 100 *
                           ( 100 [Inspiral Carpets] *
                            25 [Clint Boon] *
                            100 [Graham Lambert] *
                            16 [Stephen Holt] *
                            49 [Tom Hingley] *
                            16 [Chris Goodwin] *
                            16 [Craig Gill] *
                            16 [David Swift] *
                            16 [Mark Hughes (19)] *
                            16 [Baggy] *
                            81 [The Inspiral Carpets] *
                            4 [The Lovers (2)] *
                            1 [Tom Hingley Band] *
                            1 [Too Much Texas] *
                            25 [The Clint Boon Experience]
                           )

                         = 1.66 x 10^20

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Inspiral Carpets] *
                            1 [Clint Boon] *
                            1 [Graham Lambert] *
                            1 [Stephen Holt] *
                            1 [Tom Hingley] *
                            1 [Chris Goodwin] *
                            1 [Craig Gill] *
                            1 [David Swift] *
                            1 [Mark Hughes (19)] *
                            1 [Baggy] *
                            1 [The Inspiral Carpets] *
                            1 [The Lovers (2)] *
                            1 [Tom Hingley Band] *
                            1 [Too Much Texas] *
                            1 [The Clint Boon Experience]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 10 Tags on post
Inbound 10 Posts tagging this
Connections 15 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 100
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
17.18% (1.66 × 1020 overall)
  • This Post (17.18%)
  • Inspiral Carpets (17.18%)
  • Graham Lambert (17.18%)
  • The Inspiral Carpets (13.92%)
  • Tom Hingley (8.42%)
  • Clint Boon (4.30%)
  • The Clint Boon Experience (4.30%)
  • Stephen Holt (2.75%)
  • Chris Goodwin (2.75%)
  • Craig Gill (2.75%)
  • David Swift (2.75%)
  • Mark Hughes (19) (2.75%)
  • Baggy (2.75%)
  • The Lovers (2) (0.69%)
  • Tom Hingley Band (0.17%)
  • Too Much Texas (0.17%)
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
6.25% (1 overall)
  • This Post (6.25%)
  • Inspiral Carpets (6.25%)
  • Clint Boon (6.25%)
  • Graham Lambert (6.25%)
  • Stephen Holt (6.25%)
  • Tom Hingley (6.25%)
  • Chris Goodwin (6.25%)
  • Craig Gill (6.25%)
  • David Swift (6.25%)
  • Mark Hughes (19) (6.25%)
  • Baggy (6.25%)
  • The Inspiral Carpets (6.25%)
  • The Lovers (2) (6.25%)
  • Tom Hingley Band (6.25%)
  • Too Much Texas (6.25%)
  • The Clint Boon Experience (6.25%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Inspiral Carpets ↗
Str: 100Inf: 1
Clint Boon ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Graham Lambert ↗
Str: 100Inf: 1
Stephen Holt ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Tom Hingley ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Chris Goodwin ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Craig Gill ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
David Swift ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Mark Hughes (19) ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Baggy ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
The Inspiral Carpets ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1
The Lovers (2) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Tom Hingley Band ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Too Much Texas ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
The Clint Boon Experience ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
The Clint Boon Experience ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Too Much Texas ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tom Hingley Band ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
The Lovers (2) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
The Inspiral Carpets ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1
Baggy ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Mark Hughes (19) ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
David Swift ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Craig Gill ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Chris Goodwin ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Tom Hingley ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Stephen Holt ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Graham Lambert ↗
Str: 100Inf: 1
Clint Boon ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Inspiral Carpets ↗
Str: 100Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (10)
Chris Goodwin
Clint Boon
Craig Gill
David Swift
Graham Lambert
Inspiral Carpets
Mark Hughes (19)
Stephen Holt
The Inspiral Carpets
Tom Hingley
Inbound Posts (10)
Inspiral Carpets
Clint Boon
Graham Lambert
Stephen Holt
Tom Hingley
The Inspiral Carpets
Chris Goodwin
Craig Gill
David Swift
Mark Hughes (19)
Last calculated: Jun 21, 8:25 PM
33

Related Content

No related content found.