Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Polyphia
Scott LePageTim Henson (3)Scott LePage (2)Clay AeschlimanClay GoberBrandon Burkhalter

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 5 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Tim Henson

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Polyphia
    Polyphia band photo

Connected Musicians

  • Brandon Burkhalter
  • Clay Aeschliman
  • Clay Gober
  • Scott LePage
  • Scott LePage (2)
  • Tim Henson (3)

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
1.69% of network
(196)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (1.69%)
  • Scott LePage (6.78%)
  • Clay Aeschliman (1.69%)
  • Clay Gober (1.69%)
  • Brandon Burkhalter (1.69%)
  • Scott LePage (2) (1.69%)
  • Tim Henson (3) (1.69%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Polyphia 83.05%
Influence Score
i
12.50% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (12.50%)
  • Polyphia (12.50%)
  • Clay Aeschliman (12.50%)
  • Clay Gober (12.50%)
  • Scott LePage (12.50%)
  • Brandon Burkhalter (12.50%)
  • Scott LePage (2) (12.50%)
  • Tim Henson (3) (12.50%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 7 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 49 [Polyphia] *
                            1 [Clay Aeschliman] *
                            1 [Clay Gober] *
                            4 [Scott LePage] *
                            1 [Brandon Burkhalter] *
                            1 [Scott LePage (2)] *
                            1 [Tim Henson (3)]
                           )

                         = 196

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Polyphia] *
                            1 [Clay Aeschliman] *
                            1 [Clay Gober] *
                            1 [Scott LePage] *
                            1 [Brandon Burkhalter] *
                            1 [Scott LePage (2)] *
                            1 [Tim Henson (3)]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 7 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
1.69% (196 overall)
  • This Post (1.69%)
  • Scott LePage (6.78%)
  • Clay Aeschliman (1.69%)
  • Clay Gober (1.69%)
  • Brandon Burkhalter (1.69%)
  • Scott LePage (2) (1.69%)
  • Tim Henson (3) (1.69%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Polyphia 83.05%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
12.50% (1 overall)
  • This Post (12.50%)
  • Polyphia (12.50%)
  • Clay Aeschliman (12.50%)
  • Clay Gober (12.50%)
  • Scott LePage (12.50%)
  • Brandon Burkhalter (12.50%)
  • Scott LePage (2) (12.50%)
  • Tim Henson (3) (12.50%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Polyphia ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Clay Aeschliman ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Clay Gober ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Scott LePage ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Brandon Burkhalter ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Scott LePage (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tim Henson (3) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Tim Henson (3) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Scott LePage (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Brandon Burkhalter ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Scott LePage ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Clay Gober ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Clay Aeschliman ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Polyphia ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Polyphia
Inbound Posts (1)
Polyphia
Last calculated: Jun 23, 10:50 AM
32

Related Content

No related content found.