Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Scott LePageMucky PupTim HensonTim Henson (3)Scott LePage (2)Clay AeschlimanClay GoberBrandon Burkhalter

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 2 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Polyphia

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Mucky Pup

Connected Musicians

  • Brandon Burkhalter
  • Clay Aeschliman
  • Clay Gober
  • Scott LePage
  • Scott LePage (2)
  • Tim Henson
  • Tim Henson (3)

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
27.22% of network
(23.7K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (27.22%)
  • Scott LePage (2.22%)
  • Clay Aeschliman (0.56%)
  • Clay Gober (0.56%)
  • Tim Henson (0.56%)
  • Brandon Burkhalter (0.56%)
  • Scott LePage (2) (0.56%)
  • Tim Henson (3) (0.56%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Mucky Pup 67.22%
Influence Score
i
11.11% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Clay Aeschliman (11.11%)
  • Clay Gober (11.11%)
  • Scott LePage (11.11%)
  • Tim Henson (11.11%)
  • Brandon Burkhalter (11.11%)
  • Scott LePage (2) (11.11%)
  • Tim Henson (3) (11.11%)
  • Mucky Pup (11.11%)
Direct Connections 14

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 7) = 7
$outbound = max(1, 7) = 7

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 7 * 7 = 49
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 7 / 7 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 8 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 49 *
                           ( 1 [Clay Aeschliman] *
                            1 [Clay Gober] *
                            4 [Scott LePage] *
                            1 [Tim Henson] *
                            1 [Brandon Burkhalter] *
                            1 [Scott LePage (2)] *
                            1 [Tim Henson (3)] *
                            121 [Mucky Pup]
                           )

                         = 23.7K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Clay Aeschliman] *
                            1 [Clay Gober] *
                            1 [Scott LePage] *
                            1 [Tim Henson] *
                            1 [Brandon Burkhalter] *
                            1 [Scott LePage (2)] *
                            1 [Tim Henson (3)] *
                            1 [Mucky Pup]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 7 Tags on post
Inbound 7 Posts tagging this
Connections 8 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 49
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
27.22% (23.7K overall)
  • This Post (27.22%)
  • Scott LePage (2.22%)
  • Clay Aeschliman (0.56%)
  • Clay Gober (0.56%)
  • Tim Henson (0.56%)
  • Brandon Burkhalter (0.56%)
  • Scott LePage (2) (0.56%)
  • Tim Henson (3) (0.56%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Mucky Pup 67.22%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
11.11% (1 overall)
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Clay Aeschliman (11.11%)
  • Clay Gober (11.11%)
  • Scott LePage (11.11%)
  • Tim Henson (11.11%)
  • Brandon Burkhalter (11.11%)
  • Scott LePage (2) (11.11%)
  • Tim Henson (3) (11.11%)
  • Mucky Pup (11.11%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Clay Aeschliman ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Clay Gober ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Scott LePage ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Tim Henson ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Brandon Burkhalter ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Scott LePage (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tim Henson (3) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mucky Pup ↗
Str: 121Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Mucky Pup ↗
Str: 121Inf: 1
Tim Henson (3) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Scott LePage (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Brandon Burkhalter ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tim Henson ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Scott LePage ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Clay Gober ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Clay Aeschliman ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (7)
Brandon Burkhalter
Clay Aeschliman
Clay Gober
Scott LePage
Scott LePage (2)
Tim Henson
Tim Henson (3)
Inbound Posts (7)
Clay Aeschliman
Clay Gober
Scott LePage
Tim Henson
Brandon Burkhalter
Scott LePage (2)
Tim Henson (3)
Last calculated: Jun 18, 3:25 AM
33

Related Content

No related content found.