Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

ConsumedBaz Barrett (2)Chris BillamLuke MossMike Ford (4)Will BurchellSteve Ford (4)

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 2 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Steven Watson

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Consumed

Connected Musicians

  • Baz Barrett (2)
  • Chris Billam
  • Luke Moss
  • Mike Ford (4)
  • Steve Ford (4)
  • Will Burchell

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
1.61% of network
(784)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (1.61%)
  • Baz Barrett (2) (6.45%)
  • Chris Billam (6.45%)
  • Luke Moss (1.61%)
  • Mike Ford (4) (1.61%)
  • Steve Ford (4) (1.61%)
  • Will Burchell (1.61%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Consumed 79.03%
Influence Score
i
12.50% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (12.50%)
  • Consumed (12.50%)
  • Baz Barrett (2) (12.50%)
  • Chris Billam (12.50%)
  • Luke Moss (12.50%)
  • Mike Ford (4) (12.50%)
  • Steve Ford (4) (12.50%)
  • Will Burchell (12.50%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 7 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 49 [Consumed] *
                            4 [Baz Barrett (2)] *
                            4 [Chris Billam] *
                            1 [Luke Moss] *
                            1 [Mike Ford (4)] *
                            1 [Steve Ford (4)] *
                            1 [Will Burchell]
                           )

                         = 784

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Consumed] *
                            1 [Baz Barrett (2)] *
                            1 [Chris Billam] *
                            1 [Luke Moss] *
                            1 [Mike Ford (4)] *
                            1 [Steve Ford (4)] *
                            1 [Will Burchell]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 7 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
1.61% (784 overall)
  • This Post (1.61%)
  • Baz Barrett (2) (6.45%)
  • Chris Billam (6.45%)
  • Luke Moss (1.61%)
  • Mike Ford (4) (1.61%)
  • Steve Ford (4) (1.61%)
  • Will Burchell (1.61%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Consumed 79.03%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
12.50% (1 overall)
  • This Post (12.50%)
  • Consumed (12.50%)
  • Baz Barrett (2) (12.50%)
  • Chris Billam (12.50%)
  • Luke Moss (12.50%)
  • Mike Ford (4) (12.50%)
  • Steve Ford (4) (12.50%)
  • Will Burchell (12.50%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Consumed ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Baz Barrett (2) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Chris Billam ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Luke Moss ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mike Ford (4) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Steve Ford (4) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Will Burchell ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Will Burchell ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Steve Ford (4) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mike Ford (4) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Luke Moss ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Chris Billam ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Baz Barrett (2) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Consumed ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Consumed
Inbound Posts (1)
Consumed
Last calculated: Jun 24, 9:40 PM
32

Related Content

No related content found.