Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

ConsumedKevin PapworthBaz Barrett (2)Steven WatsonLawnmower DethLuke MossPete Lee (2)Steve NesfieldJoseph WhitakerMike Ford (4)

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

jacierlogyn
Last login: 5 hours ago
Comments: 0

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 1 day ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Chris Billam

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Consumed
  • Lawnmower Deth

Connected Musicians

  • Baz Barrett (2)
  • Chris Flint
  • Chris Parkes (2)
  • Gavin ‘Paddy’ O’Malley
  • Gavin O’Mally
  • Joseph Whitaker
  • Kevin Papworth
  • Luke Moss
  • Mike Ford (4)
  • Pete Lee
  • Pete Lee (2)
  • Steve Ford (4)
  • Steve Nesfield
  • Steven Watson
  • Will Burchell

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
2.26% of network
(1.25M)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (2.26%)
  • Baz Barrett (2) (2.26%)
  • Joseph Whitaker (2.26%)
  • Kevin Papworth (2.26%)
  • Luke Moss (0.56%)
  • Mike Ford (4) (0.56%)
  • Steve Ford (4) (0.56%)
  • Steven Watson (0.56%)
  • Will Burchell (0.56%)
  • Chris Flint (0.56%)
  • Gavin ‘Paddy’ O’Malley (0.56%)
  • Pete Lee (0.56%)
  • Steve Nesfield (0.56%)
  • Chris Parkes (2) (0.56%)
  • Pete Lee (2) (0.56%)
  • Gavin O'Mally (0.56%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Lawnmower Deth 56.50%Consumed 27.68%
Influence Score
i
5.56% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (5.56%)
  • Consumed (5.56%)
  • Baz Barrett (2) (5.56%)
  • Luke Moss (5.56%)
  • Mike Ford (4) (5.56%)
  • Steve Ford (4) (5.56%)
  • Steven Watson (5.56%)
  • Will Burchell (5.56%)
  • Lawnmower Deth (5.56%)
  • Chris Flint (5.56%)
  • Gavin ‘Paddy’ O’Malley (5.56%)
  • Joseph Whitaker (5.56%)
  • Pete Lee (5.56%)
  • Steve Nesfield (5.56%)
  • Chris Parkes (2) (5.56%)
  • Kevin Papworth (5.56%)
  • Pete Lee (2) (5.56%)
  • Gavin O'Mally (5.56%)
Direct Connections 4

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 2) = 2
$outbound = max(1, 2) = 2

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 2 * 2 = 4
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 2 / 2 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 17 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 4 *
                           ( 49 [Consumed] *
                            4 [Baz Barrett (2)] *
                            1 [Luke Moss] *
                            1 [Mike Ford (4)] *
                            1 [Steve Ford (4)] *
                            1 [Steven Watson] *
                            1 [Will Burchell] *
                            100 [Lawnmower Deth] *
                            1 [Chris Flint] *
                            1 [Gavin ‘Paddy’ O’Malley] *
                            4 [Joseph Whitaker] *
                            1 [Pete Lee] *
                            1 [Steve Nesfield] *
                            1 [Chris Parkes (2)] *
                            4 [Kevin Papworth] *
                            1 [Pete Lee (2)] *
                            1 [Gavin O'Mally]
                           )

                         = 1.25M

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Consumed] *
                            1 [Baz Barrett (2)] *
                            1 [Luke Moss] *
                            1 [Mike Ford (4)] *
                            1 [Steve Ford (4)] *
                            1 [Steven Watson] *
                            1 [Will Burchell] *
                            1 [Lawnmower Deth] *
                            1 [Chris Flint] *
                            1 [Gavin ‘Paddy’ O’Malley] *
                            1 [Joseph Whitaker] *
                            1 [Pete Lee] *
                            1 [Steve Nesfield] *
                            1 [Chris Parkes (2)] *
                            1 [Kevin Papworth] *
                            1 [Pete Lee (2)] *
                            1 [Gavin O'Mally]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 2 Tags on post
Inbound 2 Posts tagging this
Connections 17 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 4
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
2.26% (1.25M overall)
  • This Post (2.26%)
  • Baz Barrett (2) (2.26%)
  • Joseph Whitaker (2.26%)
  • Kevin Papworth (2.26%)
  • Luke Moss (0.56%)
  • Mike Ford (4) (0.56%)
  • Steve Ford (4) (0.56%)
  • Steven Watson (0.56%)
  • Will Burchell (0.56%)
  • Chris Flint (0.56%)
  • Gavin ‘Paddy’ O’Malley (0.56%)
  • Pete Lee (0.56%)
  • Steve Nesfield (0.56%)
  • Chris Parkes (2) (0.56%)
  • Pete Lee (2) (0.56%)
  • Gavin O'Mally (0.56%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Lawnmower Deth 56.50%Consumed 27.68%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
5.56% (1 overall)
  • This Post (5.56%)
  • Consumed (5.56%)
  • Baz Barrett (2) (5.56%)
  • Luke Moss (5.56%)
  • Mike Ford (4) (5.56%)
  • Steve Ford (4) (5.56%)
  • Steven Watson (5.56%)
  • Will Burchell (5.56%)
  • Lawnmower Deth (5.56%)
  • Chris Flint (5.56%)
  • Gavin ‘Paddy’ O’Malley (5.56%)
  • Joseph Whitaker (5.56%)
  • Pete Lee (5.56%)
  • Steve Nesfield (5.56%)
  • Chris Parkes (2) (5.56%)
  • Kevin Papworth (5.56%)
  • Pete Lee (2) (5.56%)
  • Gavin O'Mally (5.56%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Consumed ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Baz Barrett (2) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Luke Moss ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mike Ford (4) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Steve Ford (4) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Steven Watson ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Will Burchell ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Lawnmower Deth ↗
Str: 100Inf: 1
Chris Flint ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Gavin ‘Paddy’ O’Malley ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Joseph Whitaker ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Pete Lee ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Steve Nesfield ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Chris Parkes (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Kevin Papworth ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Pete Lee (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Gavin O'Mally ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Gavin O'Mally ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Pete Lee (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Kevin Papworth ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Chris Parkes (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Steve Nesfield ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Pete Lee ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Joseph Whitaker ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Gavin ‘Paddy’ O’Malley ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Chris Flint ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Lawnmower Deth ↗
Str: 100Inf: 1
Will Burchell ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Steven Watson ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Steve Ford (4) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mike Ford (4) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Luke Moss ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Baz Barrett (2) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Consumed ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (2)
Consumed
Lawnmower Deth
Inbound Posts (2)
Consumed
Lawnmower Deth
Last calculated: Jun 29, 10:09 AM
32

Related Content

No related content found.