Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Honeybus
Pete Kircher
Peter KircherColin HareLloyd CourtenayJim Kelly (6)Peter Blumson

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 1 day ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Ray Cane

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Honeybus
    Honeybus band photo

Connected Musicians

  • Colin Hare
  • Jim Kelly (6)
  • Lloyd Courtenay
  • Pete Kircher
    Pete Kircher band photo
  • Peter Blumson
  • Peter Kircher

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.65% of network
(254K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.65%)
  • Peter Kircher (10.39%)
  • Colin Hare (2.60%)
  • Jim Kelly (6) (0.65%)
  • Lloyd Courtenay (0.65%)
  • Peter Blumson (0.65%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Pete Kircher 52.60%Honeybus 31.82%
Influence Score
i
12.50% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (12.50%)
  • Honeybus (12.50%)
  • Peter Kircher (12.50%)
  • Colin Hare (12.50%)
  • Pete Kircher (12.50%)
  • Jim Kelly (6) (12.50%)
  • Lloyd Courtenay (12.50%)
  • Peter Blumson (12.50%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 7 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 49 [Honeybus] *
                            16 [Peter Kircher] *
                            4 [Colin Hare] *
                            81 [Pete Kircher] *
                            1 [Jim Kelly (6)] *
                            1 [Lloyd Courtenay] *
                            1 [Peter Blumson]
                           )

                         = 254K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Honeybus] *
                            1 [Peter Kircher] *
                            1 [Colin Hare] *
                            1 [Pete Kircher] *
                            1 [Jim Kelly (6)] *
                            1 [Lloyd Courtenay] *
                            1 [Peter Blumson]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 7 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.65% (254K overall)
  • This Post (0.65%)
  • Peter Kircher (10.39%)
  • Colin Hare (2.60%)
  • Jim Kelly (6) (0.65%)
  • Lloyd Courtenay (0.65%)
  • Peter Blumson (0.65%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Pete Kircher 52.60%Honeybus 31.82%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
12.50% (1 overall)
  • This Post (12.50%)
  • Honeybus (12.50%)
  • Peter Kircher (12.50%)
  • Colin Hare (12.50%)
  • Pete Kircher (12.50%)
  • Jim Kelly (6) (12.50%)
  • Lloyd Courtenay (12.50%)
  • Peter Blumson (12.50%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Honeybus ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Peter Kircher ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Colin Hare ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Pete Kircher ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1
Jim Kelly (6) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Lloyd Courtenay ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Peter Blumson ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Peter Blumson ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Lloyd Courtenay ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jim Kelly (6) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Pete Kircher ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1
Colin Hare ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Peter Kircher ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Honeybus ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Honeybus
Inbound Posts (1)
Honeybus
Last calculated: Jun 24, 2:11 PM
19

Related Content

No related content found.