Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Romano’s Ballroom
Honeybus
Pete Kircher
Peter KircherJohn Lantree
the honeycombs
Honey LantreeAllan WardPeter PyeLloyd Courtenay

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 9 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Colin Hare

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Honeybus
    Honeybus band photo
  • the honeycombs
    the honeycombs band photo

Connected Musicians

  • Allan Ward
  • Honey Lantree
  • Jim Kelly (6)
  • John Lantree
  • Lloyd Courtenay
  • Martin Murray
  • Pete Kircher
    Pete Kircher band photo
  • Peter Blumson
  • Peter Kircher
  • Peter Pye
  • Ray Cane
  • Rod Butler (4)

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
1.49% of network
(658.41M)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (1.49%)
  • Jim Kelly (6) (0.37%)
  • Lloyd Courtenay (0.37%)
  • Peter Blumson (0.37%)
  • Ray Cane (0.37%)
  • Allan Ward (0.37%)
  • Honey Lantree (0.37%)
  • John Lantree (0.37%)
  • Martin Murray (0.37%)
  • Peter Pye (0.37%)
  • Rod Butler (4) (0.37%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Pete Kircher 30.22%the honeycombs 26.87%Honeybus 18.28%Romano's Ballroom 13.43%Peter Kircher 5.97%
Influence Score
i
6.20% of network
(1.13)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (6.20%)
  • the honeycombs (6.98%)
  • Honeybus (6.20%)
  • Peter Kircher (6.20%)
  • Pete Kircher (6.20%)
  • Jim Kelly (6) (6.20%)
  • Lloyd Courtenay (6.20%)
  • Peter Blumson (6.20%)
  • Ray Cane (6.20%)
  • Romano's Ballroom (6.20%)
  • Allan Ward (6.20%)
  • Honey Lantree (6.20%)
  • John Lantree (6.20%)
  • Martin Murray (6.20%)
  • Peter Pye (6.20%)
  • Rod Butler (4) (6.20%)
Direct Connections 4

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 2) = 2
$outbound = max(1, 2) = 2

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 2 * 2 = 4
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 2 / 2 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 15 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 4 *
                           ( 72 [the honeycombs] *
                            49 [Honeybus] *
                            16 [Peter Kircher] *
                            81 [Pete Kircher] *
                            1 [Jim Kelly (6)] *
                            1 [Lloyd Courtenay] *
                            1 [Peter Blumson] *
                            1 [Ray Cane] *
                            36 [Romano's Ballroom] *
                            1 [Allan Ward] *
                            1 [Honey Lantree] *
                            1 [John Lantree] *
                            1 [Martin Murray] *
                            1 [Peter Pye] *
                            1 [Rod Butler (4)]
                           )

                         = 658.41M

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1.13 [the honeycombs] *
                            1 [Honeybus] *
                            1 [Peter Kircher] *
                            1 [Pete Kircher] *
                            1 [Jim Kelly (6)] *
                            1 [Lloyd Courtenay] *
                            1 [Peter Blumson] *
                            1 [Ray Cane] *
                            1 [Romano's Ballroom] *
                            1 [Allan Ward] *
                            1 [Honey Lantree] *
                            1 [John Lantree] *
                            1 [Martin Murray] *
                            1 [Peter Pye] *
                            1 [Rod Butler (4)]
                           )

                         = 1.13
Outbound 2 Tags on post
Inbound 2 Posts tagging this
Connections 15 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 4
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
1.49% (658.41M overall)
  • This Post (1.49%)
  • Jim Kelly (6) (0.37%)
  • Lloyd Courtenay (0.37%)
  • Peter Blumson (0.37%)
  • Ray Cane (0.37%)
  • Allan Ward (0.37%)
  • Honey Lantree (0.37%)
  • John Lantree (0.37%)
  • Martin Murray (0.37%)
  • Peter Pye (0.37%)
  • Rod Butler (4) (0.37%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Pete Kircher 30.22%the honeycombs 26.87%Honeybus 18.28%Romano's Ballroom 13.43%Peter Kircher 5.97%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
6.20% (1.13 overall)
  • This Post (6.20%)
  • the honeycombs (6.98%)
  • Honeybus (6.20%)
  • Peter Kircher (6.20%)
  • Pete Kircher (6.20%)
  • Jim Kelly (6) (6.20%)
  • Lloyd Courtenay (6.20%)
  • Peter Blumson (6.20%)
  • Ray Cane (6.20%)
  • Romano's Ballroom (6.20%)
  • Allan Ward (6.20%)
  • Honey Lantree (6.20%)
  • John Lantree (6.20%)
  • Martin Murray (6.20%)
  • Peter Pye (6.20%)
  • Rod Butler (4) (6.20%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
the honeycombs ↗
Str: 72Inf: 1.13
Honeybus ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Peter Kircher ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Pete Kircher ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1
Jim Kelly (6) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Lloyd Courtenay ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Peter Blumson ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ray Cane ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Romano's Ballroom ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Allan Ward ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Honey Lantree ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
John Lantree ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Martin Murray ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Peter Pye ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Rod Butler (4) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Rod Butler (4) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Peter Pye ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Martin Murray ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
John Lantree ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Honey Lantree ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Allan Ward ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Romano's Ballroom ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Ray Cane ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Peter Blumson ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Lloyd Courtenay ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jim Kelly (6) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Pete Kircher ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1
Peter Kircher ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Honeybus ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
the honeycombs ↗
Str: 72Inf: 1.13

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (2)
Honeybus
the honeycombs
Inbound Posts (2)
the honeycombs
Honeybus
Last calculated: Jun 22, 1:46 AM
30

Related Content

Venues

  • Romano’s Ballroom