Skip to content

Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Niels AdamsDanny TunkerBenny BatsProstitute DisfigurementEric de WindtMartijn MoesMike Ferguson (2)Michiel van der PlichtRoel van Kruysdijk

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 5 days ago
Comments: 0

Francesca Ladybird
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Matthew Leech
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 1

Jessica
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Darragh Lennon
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Cathal Kennedy
Last login: 3 months ago
Comments: 0

Patrick Oosterveen

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Prostitute Disfigurement

Connected Musicians

  • Benny Bats
  • Danny Tunker
  • Eric de Windt
  • Martijn Moes
  • Michiel van der Plicht
  • Mike Ferguson (2)
  • Niels Adams
  • Roel van Kruysdijk

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.73% of network
(11.94M)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.73%)
  • Danny Tunker (11.68%)
  • Eric de Windt (11.68%)
  • Michiel van der Plicht (6.57%)
  • Niels Adams (2.92%)
  • Martijn Moes (2.92%)
  • Mike Ferguson (2) (2.92%)
  • Benny Bats (0.73%)
  • Roel van Kruysdijk (0.73%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Prostitute Disfigurement 59.12%
Influence Score
i
10.00% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (10.00%)
  • Prostitute Disfigurement (10.00%)
  • Niels Adams (10.00%)
  • Danny Tunker (10.00%)
  • Michiel van der Plicht (10.00%)
  • Eric de Windt (10.00%)
  • Martijn Moes (10.00%)
  • Benny Bats (10.00%)
  • Mike Ferguson (2) (10.00%)
  • Roel van Kruysdijk (10.00%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 9 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 81 [Prostitute Disfigurement] *
                            4 [Niels Adams] *
                            16 [Danny Tunker] *
                            9 [Michiel van der Plicht] *
                            16 [Eric de Windt] *
                            4 [Martijn Moes] *
                            1 [Benny Bats] *
                            4 [Mike Ferguson (2)] *
                            1 [Roel van Kruysdijk]
                           )

                         = 11.94M

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Prostitute Disfigurement] *
                            1 [Niels Adams] *
                            1 [Danny Tunker] *
                            1 [Michiel van der Plicht] *
                            1 [Eric de Windt] *
                            1 [Martijn Moes] *
                            1 [Benny Bats] *
                            1 [Mike Ferguson (2)] *
                            1 [Roel van Kruysdijk]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 9 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.73% (11.94M overall)
  • This Post (0.73%)
  • Danny Tunker (11.68%)
  • Eric de Windt (11.68%)
  • Michiel van der Plicht (6.57%)
  • Niels Adams (2.92%)
  • Martijn Moes (2.92%)
  • Mike Ferguson (2) (2.92%)
  • Benny Bats (0.73%)
  • Roel van Kruysdijk (0.73%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Prostitute Disfigurement 59.12%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
10.00% (1 overall)
  • This Post (10.00%)
  • Prostitute Disfigurement (10.00%)
  • Niels Adams (10.00%)
  • Danny Tunker (10.00%)
  • Michiel van der Plicht (10.00%)
  • Eric de Windt (10.00%)
  • Martijn Moes (10.00%)
  • Benny Bats (10.00%)
  • Mike Ferguson (2) (10.00%)
  • Roel van Kruysdijk (10.00%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Prostitute Disfigurement ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1
Niels Adams ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Danny Tunker ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Michiel van der Plicht ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Eric de Windt ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Martijn Moes ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Benny Bats ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mike Ferguson (2) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Roel van Kruysdijk ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Roel van Kruysdijk ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mike Ferguson (2) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Benny Bats ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Martijn Moes ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Eric de Windt ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Michiel van der Plicht ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Danny Tunker ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Niels Adams ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Prostitute Disfigurement ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Prostitute Disfigurement
Inbound Posts (1)
Prostitute Disfigurement
Last calculated: Oct 4, 6:28 AM
33

Related Content

No related content found.

A Muso community