Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Jerry BrouwerOskar van ParadijsPatrick BoleijBenny BatsEric de WindtPatrick OosterveenSeth van de LooMartijn MoesProstitute DisfigurementDanny Tunker

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 16 hours ago
Comments: 0

jacierlogyn
Last login: 3 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Niels Adams

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Centurian
  • Prostitute Disfigurement

Connected Musicians

  • Benny Bats
  • Danny Tunker
  • Eric de Windt
  • Jerry Brouwer
  • Martijn Moes
  • Michiel van der Plicht
  • Mike Ferguson (2)
  • Oskar van Paradijs
  • Patrick Boleij
  • Patrick Oosterveen
  • Rob Oorthuis
  • Roel van Kruysdijk
  • Seth van de Loo
  • Wim van der Valk

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
1.74% of network
(84.28B)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (1.74%)
  • Seth van de Loo (15.65%)
  • Danny Tunker (6.96%)
  • Eric de Windt (6.96%)
  • Michiel van der Plicht (3.91%)
  • Martijn Moes (1.74%)
  • Mike Ferguson (2) (1.74%)
  • Patrick Boleij (1.74%)
  • Benny Bats (0.43%)
  • Patrick Oosterveen (0.43%)
  • Roel van Kruysdijk (0.43%)
  • Rob Oorthuis (0.43%)
  • Wim van der Valk (0.43%)
  • Jerry Brouwer (0.43%)
  • Oskar van Paradijs (0.43%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Prostitute Disfigurement 35.22%Centurian 21.30%
Influence Score
i
5.88% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (5.88%)
  • Prostitute Disfigurement (5.88%)
  • Danny Tunker (5.88%)
  • Michiel van der Plicht (5.88%)
  • Eric de Windt (5.88%)
  • Martijn Moes (5.88%)
  • Benny Bats (5.88%)
  • Mike Ferguson (2) (5.88%)
  • Patrick Oosterveen (5.88%)
  • Roel van Kruysdijk (5.88%)
  • Centurian (5.88%)
  • Patrick Boleij (5.88%)
  • Rob Oorthuis (5.88%)
  • Wim van der Valk (5.88%)
  • Seth van de Loo (5.88%)
  • Jerry Brouwer (5.88%)
  • Oskar van Paradijs (5.88%)
Direct Connections 4

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 2) = 2
$outbound = max(1, 2) = 2

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 2 * 2 = 4
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 2 / 2 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 16 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 4 *
                           ( 81 [Prostitute Disfigurement] *
                            16 [Danny Tunker] *
                            9 [Michiel van der Plicht] *
                            16 [Eric de Windt] *
                            4 [Martijn Moes] *
                            1 [Benny Bats] *
                            4 [Mike Ferguson (2)] *
                            1 [Patrick Oosterveen] *
                            1 [Roel van Kruysdijk] *
                            49 [Centurian] *
                            4 [Patrick Boleij] *
                            1 [Rob Oorthuis] *
                            1 [Wim van der Valk] *
                            36 [Seth van de Loo] *
                            1 [Jerry Brouwer] *
                            1 [Oskar van Paradijs]
                           )

                         = 84.28B

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Prostitute Disfigurement] *
                            1 [Danny Tunker] *
                            1 [Michiel van der Plicht] *
                            1 [Eric de Windt] *
                            1 [Martijn Moes] *
                            1 [Benny Bats] *
                            1 [Mike Ferguson (2)] *
                            1 [Patrick Oosterveen] *
                            1 [Roel van Kruysdijk] *
                            1 [Centurian] *
                            1 [Patrick Boleij] *
                            1 [Rob Oorthuis] *
                            1 [Wim van der Valk] *
                            1 [Seth van de Loo] *
                            1 [Jerry Brouwer] *
                            1 [Oskar van Paradijs]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 2 Tags on post
Inbound 2 Posts tagging this
Connections 16 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 4
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
1.74% (84.28B overall)
  • This Post (1.74%)
  • Seth van de Loo (15.65%)
  • Danny Tunker (6.96%)
  • Eric de Windt (6.96%)
  • Michiel van der Plicht (3.91%)
  • Martijn Moes (1.74%)
  • Mike Ferguson (2) (1.74%)
  • Patrick Boleij (1.74%)
  • Benny Bats (0.43%)
  • Patrick Oosterveen (0.43%)
  • Roel van Kruysdijk (0.43%)
  • Rob Oorthuis (0.43%)
  • Wim van der Valk (0.43%)
  • Jerry Brouwer (0.43%)
  • Oskar van Paradijs (0.43%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Prostitute Disfigurement 35.22%Centurian 21.30%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
5.88% (1 overall)
  • This Post (5.88%)
  • Prostitute Disfigurement (5.88%)
  • Danny Tunker (5.88%)
  • Michiel van der Plicht (5.88%)
  • Eric de Windt (5.88%)
  • Martijn Moes (5.88%)
  • Benny Bats (5.88%)
  • Mike Ferguson (2) (5.88%)
  • Patrick Oosterveen (5.88%)
  • Roel van Kruysdijk (5.88%)
  • Centurian (5.88%)
  • Patrick Boleij (5.88%)
  • Rob Oorthuis (5.88%)
  • Wim van der Valk (5.88%)
  • Seth van de Loo (5.88%)
  • Jerry Brouwer (5.88%)
  • Oskar van Paradijs (5.88%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Prostitute Disfigurement ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1
Danny Tunker ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Michiel van der Plicht ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Eric de Windt ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Martijn Moes ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Benny Bats ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mike Ferguson (2) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Patrick Oosterveen ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Roel van Kruysdijk ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Centurian ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Patrick Boleij ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Rob Oorthuis ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Wim van der Valk ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Seth van de Loo ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Jerry Brouwer ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Oskar van Paradijs ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Oskar van Paradijs ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jerry Brouwer ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Seth van de Loo ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Wim van der Valk ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Rob Oorthuis ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Patrick Boleij ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Centurian ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Roel van Kruysdijk ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Patrick Oosterveen ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mike Ferguson (2) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Benny Bats ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Martijn Moes ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Eric de Windt ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Michiel van der Plicht ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Danny Tunker ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Prostitute Disfigurement ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (2)
Centurian
Prostitute Disfigurement
Inbound Posts (2)
Centurian
Prostitute Disfigurement
Last calculated: Jul 2, 4:11 AM
36

Related Content

No related content found.