Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Bruce BraybrookeClay McDonaldThe Beautiful GirlsLachie ThomasClay MacdonaldHugh BarrettMitchell ConnellyFelipe Kmiecik

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 3 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Mat McHugh

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • The Beautiful Girls

Connected Musicians

  • Bruce Braybrooke
  • Clay Macdonald
  • Clay McDonald
  • Felipe Kmiecik
  • Hugh Barrett
  • Lachie Thomas
  • Mitchell Connelly

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
1.33% of network
(256)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (1.33%)
  • Bruce Braybrooke (5.33%)
  • Clay Macdonald (1.33%)
  • Lachie Thomas (1.33%)
  • Clay McDonald (1.33%)
  • Felipe Kmiecik (1.33%)
  • Hugh Barrett (1.33%)
  • Mitchell Connelly (1.33%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
The Beautiful Girls 85.33%
Influence Score
i
11.11% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • The Beautiful Girls (11.11%)
  • Bruce Braybrooke (11.11%)
  • Clay Macdonald (11.11%)
  • Lachie Thomas (11.11%)
  • Clay McDonald (11.11%)
  • Felipe Kmiecik (11.11%)
  • Hugh Barrett (11.11%)
  • Mitchell Connelly (11.11%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 8 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 64 [The Beautiful Girls] *
                            4 [Bruce Braybrooke] *
                            1 [Clay Macdonald] *
                            1 [Lachie Thomas] *
                            1 [Clay McDonald] *
                            1 [Felipe Kmiecik] *
                            1 [Hugh Barrett] *
                            1 [Mitchell Connelly]
                           )

                         = 256

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [The Beautiful Girls] *
                            1 [Bruce Braybrooke] *
                            1 [Clay Macdonald] *
                            1 [Lachie Thomas] *
                            1 [Clay McDonald] *
                            1 [Felipe Kmiecik] *
                            1 [Hugh Barrett] *
                            1 [Mitchell Connelly]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 8 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
1.33% (256 overall)
  • This Post (1.33%)
  • Bruce Braybrooke (5.33%)
  • Clay Macdonald (1.33%)
  • Lachie Thomas (1.33%)
  • Clay McDonald (1.33%)
  • Felipe Kmiecik (1.33%)
  • Hugh Barrett (1.33%)
  • Mitchell Connelly (1.33%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
The Beautiful Girls 85.33%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
11.11% (1 overall)
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • The Beautiful Girls (11.11%)
  • Bruce Braybrooke (11.11%)
  • Clay Macdonald (11.11%)
  • Lachie Thomas (11.11%)
  • Clay McDonald (11.11%)
  • Felipe Kmiecik (11.11%)
  • Hugh Barrett (11.11%)
  • Mitchell Connelly (11.11%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
The Beautiful Girls ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Bruce Braybrooke ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Clay Macdonald ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Lachie Thomas ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Clay McDonald ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Felipe Kmiecik ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Hugh Barrett ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mitchell Connelly ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Mitchell Connelly ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Hugh Barrett ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Felipe Kmiecik ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Clay McDonald ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Lachie Thomas ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Clay Macdonald ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Bruce Braybrooke ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
The Beautiful Girls ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
The Beautiful Girls
Inbound Posts (1)
The Beautiful Girls
Last calculated: Jun 22, 8:09 PM
10

Related Content

No related content found.