Skip to content

Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Bruce BraybrookeClay McDonaldFrenzal RhombLachie ThomasMitchell ConnellyClay MacdonaldMat McHughHugh BarrettFelipe Kmiecik

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 1 week ago
Comments: 42

Francesca Ladybird
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Matthew Leech
Last login: 3 months ago
Comments: 1

Jessica
Last login: 4 months ago
Comments: 0

Darragh Lennon
Last login: 4 months ago
Comments: 0

Cathal Kennedy
Last login: 4 months ago
Comments: 0

The Beautiful Girls

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Frenzal Rhomb

Connected Musicians

  • Bruce Braybrooke
  • Clay Macdonald
  • Clay McDonald
  • Felipe Kmiecik
  • Hugh Barrett
  • Lachie Thomas
  • Mat McHugh
  • Mitchell Connelly

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
36.57% of network
(25.6K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (36.57%)
  • Bruce Braybrooke (2.29%)
  • Clay Macdonald (0.57%)
  • Lachie Thomas (0.57%)
  • Mat McHugh (0.57%)
  • Clay McDonald (0.57%)
  • Felipe Kmiecik (0.57%)
  • Hugh Barrett (0.57%)
  • Mitchell Connelly (0.57%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Frenzal Rhomb 57.14%
Influence Score
i
10.00% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (10.00%)
  • Bruce Braybrooke (10.00%)
  • Clay Macdonald (10.00%)
  • Lachie Thomas (10.00%)
  • Mat McHugh (10.00%)
  • Clay McDonald (10.00%)
  • Felipe Kmiecik (10.00%)
  • Hugh Barrett (10.00%)
  • Mitchell Connelly (10.00%)
  • Frenzal Rhomb (10.00%)
Direct Connections 16

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 8) = 8
$outbound = max(1, 8) = 8

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 8 * 8 = 64
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 8 / 8 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 9 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 64 *
                           ( 4 [Bruce Braybrooke] *
                            1 [Clay Macdonald] *
                            1 [Lachie Thomas] *
                            1 [Mat McHugh] *
                            1 [Clay McDonald] *
                            1 [Felipe Kmiecik] *
                            1 [Hugh Barrett] *
                            1 [Mitchell Connelly] *
                            100 [Frenzal Rhomb]
                           )

                         = 25.6K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Bruce Braybrooke] *
                            1 [Clay Macdonald] *
                            1 [Lachie Thomas] *
                            1 [Mat McHugh] *
                            1 [Clay McDonald] *
                            1 [Felipe Kmiecik] *
                            1 [Hugh Barrett] *
                            1 [Mitchell Connelly] *
                            1 [Frenzal Rhomb]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 8 Tags on post
Inbound 8 Posts tagging this
Connections 9 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 64
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
36.57% (25.6K overall)
  • This Post (36.57%)
  • Bruce Braybrooke (2.29%)
  • Clay Macdonald (0.57%)
  • Lachie Thomas (0.57%)
  • Mat McHugh (0.57%)
  • Clay McDonald (0.57%)
  • Felipe Kmiecik (0.57%)
  • Hugh Barrett (0.57%)
  • Mitchell Connelly (0.57%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Frenzal Rhomb 57.14%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
10.00% (1 overall)
  • This Post (10.00%)
  • Bruce Braybrooke (10.00%)
  • Clay Macdonald (10.00%)
  • Lachie Thomas (10.00%)
  • Mat McHugh (10.00%)
  • Clay McDonald (10.00%)
  • Felipe Kmiecik (10.00%)
  • Hugh Barrett (10.00%)
  • Mitchell Connelly (10.00%)
  • Frenzal Rhomb (10.00%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Bruce Braybrooke ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Clay Macdonald ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Lachie Thomas ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mat McHugh ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Clay McDonald ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Felipe Kmiecik ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Hugh Barrett ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mitchell Connelly ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Frenzal Rhomb ↗
Str: 100Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Frenzal Rhomb ↗
Str: 100Inf: 1
Mitchell Connelly ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Hugh Barrett ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Felipe Kmiecik ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Clay McDonald ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mat McHugh ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Lachie Thomas ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Clay Macdonald ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Bruce Braybrooke ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (8)
Bruce Braybrooke
Clay Macdonald
Clay McDonald
Felipe Kmiecik
Hugh Barrett
Lachie Thomas
Mat McHugh
Mitchell Connelly
Inbound Posts (8)
Bruce Braybrooke
Clay Macdonald
Lachie Thomas
Mat McHugh
Clay McDonald
Felipe Kmiecik
Hugh Barrett
Mitchell Connelly
Last calculated: Nov 13, 12:50 PM
20

Related Content

No related content found.

A Muso community