Network Profile
View Network Math
Overall Strength
2.53%
of network16 )
Influence Score
8.33%
of network
Direct Connections
7
Node & Network Strength Details
×
How is this calculated? The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the website.
Every tag forms a network link. The pie charts below show each connected post's base strength (PV) and influence (IV) as a share of this post's direct neighbourhood.
Outbound
4
Tags on post
Inbound
3
Posts tagging this
Base Node Strength
12
Base Node Influence
1.3333
Connected Nodes
15
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
2.53%
(1.87 × 1016 overall)
This Post (2.53%) Julie Moyle (5.27%) Mark Dignam (3.38%) Sin É (1.90%) Karl Geary (1.27%) Danny Aaron (0.84%) Mike Watson (0.84%) Scott Dalhover (0.84%) Kevin Fowler (0.84%) Ronan Leonard (0.84%) Michael Hannon (0.84%) Mike Watson (2) (0.84%) Tim Trembly (0.84%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart) Jason McMaster 47.47% Dangerous Toys 21.10% Dave Hingerty 10.34%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
This Post (8.33%) Mark Dignam (6.25%) Dave Hingerty (6.25%) Sin É (6.25%) Dangerous Toys (6.25%) Jason McMaster (6.25%) Danny Aaron (6.25%) Mike Watson (6.25%) Scott Dalhover (6.25%) Kevin Fowler (6.25%) Julie Moyle (6.25%) Ronan Leonard (6.25%) Michael Hannon (6.25%) Mike Watson (2) (6.25%) Tim Trembly (6.25%) Karl Geary (4.17%)
Connected Network (How neighbours affect this node)
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)
Last calculated math cycle: May 2, 9:05 AM
Close Report
Analyzing Network Connections...
Most Relevant
Most Integral
Depth: 1 Level
Depth: 2 Levels
Depth: 3 Levels
Depth: 4 Levels
Depth: 5 Levels
Depth: 6 Levels
Depth: 7 Levels
👁️ 165 Views
