Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Mark Geary
Dangerous Toys
Mike WatsonKevin FowlerMichael HannonScott DalhoverJason McMasterTim TremblyMike Watson (2)

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 9 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 5 days ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Danny Aaron

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Dangerous Toys
    Dangerous Toys band photo

Connected Musicians

  • Jason McMaster
  • Kevin Fowler
  • Mark Geary
    Mark Geary band photo
  • Michael Hannon
  • Mike Watson
  • Mike Watson (2)
  • Scott Dalhover
  • Tim Trembly

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.34% of network
(95.3K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.34%)
  • Mark Geary (2.07%)
  • Mike Watson (0.34%)
  • Scott Dalhover (0.34%)
  • Kevin Fowler (0.34%)
  • Michael Hannon (0.34%)
  • Mike Watson (2) (0.34%)
  • Tim Trembly (0.34%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Jason McMaster 67.59%Dangerous Toys 27.93%
Influence Score
i
9.52% of network
(1.5)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (9.52%)
  • Mark Geary (14.29%)
  • Dangerous Toys (9.52%)
  • Jason McMaster (9.52%)
  • Mike Watson (9.52%)
  • Scott Dalhover (9.52%)
  • Kevin Fowler (9.52%)
  • Michael Hannon (9.52%)
  • Mike Watson (2) (9.52%)
  • Tim Trembly (9.52%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 9 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 6 [Mark Geary] *
                            81 [Dangerous Toys] *
                            196 [Jason McMaster] *
                            1 [Mike Watson] *
                            1 [Scott Dalhover] *
                            1 [Kevin Fowler] *
                            1 [Michael Hannon] *
                            1 [Mike Watson (2)] *
                            1 [Tim Trembly]
                           )

                         = 95.3K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1.5 [Mark Geary] *
                            1 [Dangerous Toys] *
                            1 [Jason McMaster] *
                            1 [Mike Watson] *
                            1 [Scott Dalhover] *
                            1 [Kevin Fowler] *
                            1 [Michael Hannon] *
                            1 [Mike Watson (2)] *
                            1 [Tim Trembly]
                           )

                         = 1.5
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 9 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.34% (95.3K overall)
  • This Post (0.34%)
  • Mark Geary (2.07%)
  • Mike Watson (0.34%)
  • Scott Dalhover (0.34%)
  • Kevin Fowler (0.34%)
  • Michael Hannon (0.34%)
  • Mike Watson (2) (0.34%)
  • Tim Trembly (0.34%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Jason McMaster 67.59%Dangerous Toys 27.93%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
9.52% (1.5 overall)
  • This Post (9.52%)
  • Mark Geary (14.29%)
  • Dangerous Toys (9.52%)
  • Jason McMaster (9.52%)
  • Mike Watson (9.52%)
  • Scott Dalhover (9.52%)
  • Kevin Fowler (9.52%)
  • Michael Hannon (9.52%)
  • Mike Watson (2) (9.52%)
  • Tim Trembly (9.52%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Mark Geary ↗
Str: 6Inf: 1.5
Dangerous Toys ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1
Jason McMaster ↗
Str: 196Inf: 1
Mike Watson ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Scott Dalhover ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Kevin Fowler ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Michael Hannon ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mike Watson (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tim Trembly ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Tim Trembly ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mike Watson (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Michael Hannon ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Kevin Fowler ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Scott Dalhover ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mike Watson ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jason McMaster ↗
Str: 196Inf: 1
Dangerous Toys ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1
Mark Geary ↗
Str: 6Inf: 1.5

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Dangerous Toys
Inbound Posts (1)
Dangerous Toys
Last calculated: Jun 11, 1:43 AM
49

Related Content

No related content found.