Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Lennart SpechtThomas AntonssonNostradameusJesse LindskogMichael ÅbergEsko SalowEric SödermanGustav Nahlin

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 3 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Freddy Persson

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Nostradameus

Connected Musicians

  • Eric Söderman
  • Esko Salow
  • Gustav Nahlin
  • Jesse Lindskog
  • Lennart Specht
  • Michael Åberg
  • Thomas Antonsson

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
1.19% of network
(16.4K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (1.19%)
  • Esko Salow (4.76%)
  • Lennart Specht (4.76%)
  • Thomas Antonsson (4.76%)
  • Jesse Lindskog (4.76%)
  • Gustav Nahlin (1.19%)
  • Eric Söderman (1.19%)
  • Michael Åberg (1.19%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Nostradameus 76.19%
Influence Score
i
11.11% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Nostradameus (11.11%)
  • Esko Salow (11.11%)
  • Lennart Specht (11.11%)
  • Thomas Antonsson (11.11%)
  • Jesse Lindskog (11.11%)
  • Gustav Nahlin (11.11%)
  • Eric Söderman (11.11%)
  • Michael Åberg (11.11%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 8 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 64 [Nostradameus] *
                            4 [Esko Salow] *
                            4 [Lennart Specht] *
                            4 [Thomas Antonsson] *
                            4 [Jesse Lindskog] *
                            1 [Gustav Nahlin] *
                            1 [Eric Söderman] *
                            1 [Michael Åberg]
                           )

                         = 16.4K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Nostradameus] *
                            1 [Esko Salow] *
                            1 [Lennart Specht] *
                            1 [Thomas Antonsson] *
                            1 [Jesse Lindskog] *
                            1 [Gustav Nahlin] *
                            1 [Eric Söderman] *
                            1 [Michael Åberg]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 8 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
1.19% (16.4K overall)
  • This Post (1.19%)
  • Esko Salow (4.76%)
  • Lennart Specht (4.76%)
  • Thomas Antonsson (4.76%)
  • Jesse Lindskog (4.76%)
  • Gustav Nahlin (1.19%)
  • Eric Söderman (1.19%)
  • Michael Åberg (1.19%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Nostradameus 76.19%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
11.11% (1 overall)
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Nostradameus (11.11%)
  • Esko Salow (11.11%)
  • Lennart Specht (11.11%)
  • Thomas Antonsson (11.11%)
  • Jesse Lindskog (11.11%)
  • Gustav Nahlin (11.11%)
  • Eric Söderman (11.11%)
  • Michael Åberg (11.11%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Nostradameus ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Esko Salow ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Lennart Specht ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Thomas Antonsson ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Jesse Lindskog ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Gustav Nahlin ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Eric Söderman ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Michael Åberg ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Michael Åberg ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Eric Söderman ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Gustav Nahlin ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jesse Lindskog ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Thomas Antonsson ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Lennart Specht ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Esko Salow ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Nostradameus ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Nostradameus
Inbound Posts (1)
Nostradameus
Last calculated: Jun 26, 9:31 AM
21

Related Content

No related content found.