Skip to content

Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Lennart SpechtThomas AntonssonNostradameusJesse LindskogMichael ÅbergFreddy PerssonEsko SalowGustav Nahlin

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 7 days ago
Comments: 0

Francesca Ladybird
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Matthew Leech
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 1

Jessica
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Darragh Lennon
Last login: 3 months ago
Comments: 0

Cathal Kennedy
Last login: 3 months ago
Comments: 0

Eric Söderman

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Nostradameus

Connected Musicians

  • Esko Salow
  • Freddy Persson
  • Gustav Nahlin
  • Jesse Lindskog
  • Lennart Specht
  • Michael Åberg
  • Thomas Antonsson

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
1.19% of network
(16.4K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (1.19%)
  • Esko Salow (4.76%)
  • Lennart Specht (4.76%)
  • Thomas Antonsson (4.76%)
  • Jesse Lindskog (4.76%)
  • Freddy Persson (1.19%)
  • Gustav Nahlin (1.19%)
  • Michael Åberg (1.19%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Nostradameus 76.19%
Influence Score
i
11.11% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Nostradameus (11.11%)
  • Esko Salow (11.11%)
  • Lennart Specht (11.11%)
  • Thomas Antonsson (11.11%)
  • Freddy Persson (11.11%)
  • Jesse Lindskog (11.11%)
  • Gustav Nahlin (11.11%)
  • Michael Åberg (11.11%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 8 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 64 [Nostradameus] *
                            4 [Esko Salow] *
                            4 [Lennart Specht] *
                            4 [Thomas Antonsson] *
                            1 [Freddy Persson] *
                            4 [Jesse Lindskog] *
                            1 [Gustav Nahlin] *
                            1 [Michael Åberg]
                           )

                         = 16.4K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Nostradameus] *
                            1 [Esko Salow] *
                            1 [Lennart Specht] *
                            1 [Thomas Antonsson] *
                            1 [Freddy Persson] *
                            1 [Jesse Lindskog] *
                            1 [Gustav Nahlin] *
                            1 [Michael Åberg]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 8 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
1.19% (16.4K overall)
  • This Post (1.19%)
  • Esko Salow (4.76%)
  • Lennart Specht (4.76%)
  • Thomas Antonsson (4.76%)
  • Jesse Lindskog (4.76%)
  • Freddy Persson (1.19%)
  • Gustav Nahlin (1.19%)
  • Michael Åberg (1.19%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Nostradameus 76.19%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
11.11% (1 overall)
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Nostradameus (11.11%)
  • Esko Salow (11.11%)
  • Lennart Specht (11.11%)
  • Thomas Antonsson (11.11%)
  • Freddy Persson (11.11%)
  • Jesse Lindskog (11.11%)
  • Gustav Nahlin (11.11%)
  • Michael Åberg (11.11%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Nostradameus ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Esko Salow ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Lennart Specht ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Thomas Antonsson ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Freddy Persson ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jesse Lindskog ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Gustav Nahlin ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Michael Åberg ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Michael Åberg ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Gustav Nahlin ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jesse Lindskog ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Freddy Persson ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Thomas Antonsson ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Lennart Specht ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Esko Salow ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Nostradameus ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Nostradameus
Inbound Posts (1)
Nostradameus
Last calculated: Oct 6, 6:17 AM
21

Related Content

No related content found.

A Muso community