Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Lecherous NocturneMike PoggioneKrieshloffAlex LanciaEthan LaneAkem ManahKyle SimmsMike BonnettiRobert Ingraham

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 2 days ago
Comments: 0

Francesca Ladybird
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Matthew Leech
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 1

Jessica
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Darragh Lennon
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Cathal Kennedy
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Chris Lollis

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Akem Manah
  • Lecherous Nocturne

Connected Musicians

  • Alex Lancia
  • Ethan Lane
  • Krieshloff
  • Kyle Simms
  • Mike Bonnetti
  • Mike Poggione
  • Robert Ingraham

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
7.27% of network
(6.4K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (7.27%)
  • Mike Poggione (7.27%)
  • Kyle Simms (1.82%)
  • Mike Bonnetti (1.82%)
  • Robert Ingraham (1.82%)
  • Alex Lancia (1.82%)
  • Ethan Lane (1.82%)
  • Krieshloff (1.82%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Lecherous Nocturne 45.45%Akem Manah 29.09%
Influence Score
i
10.00% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (10.00%)
  • Akem Manah (10.00%)
  • Kyle Simms (10.00%)
  • Mike Bonnetti (10.00%)
  • Robert Ingraham (10.00%)
  • Lecherous Nocturne (10.00%)
  • Alex Lancia (10.00%)
  • Mike Poggione (10.00%)
  • Ethan Lane (10.00%)
  • Krieshloff (10.00%)
Direct Connections 4

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 2) = 2
$outbound = max(1, 2) = 2

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 2 * 2 = 4
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 2 / 2 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 9 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 4 *
                           ( 16 [Akem Manah] *
                            1 [Kyle Simms] *
                            1 [Mike Bonnetti] *
                            1 [Robert Ingraham] *
                            25 [Lecherous Nocturne] *
                            1 [Alex Lancia] *
                            4 [Mike Poggione] *
                            1 [Ethan Lane] *
                            1 [Krieshloff]
                           )

                         = 6.4K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Akem Manah] *
                            1 [Kyle Simms] *
                            1 [Mike Bonnetti] *
                            1 [Robert Ingraham] *
                            1 [Lecherous Nocturne] *
                            1 [Alex Lancia] *
                            1 [Mike Poggione] *
                            1 [Ethan Lane] *
                            1 [Krieshloff]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 2 Tags on post
Inbound 2 Posts tagging this
Connections 9 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 4
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
7.27% (6.4K overall)
  • This Post (7.27%)
  • Mike Poggione (7.27%)
  • Kyle Simms (1.82%)
  • Mike Bonnetti (1.82%)
  • Robert Ingraham (1.82%)
  • Alex Lancia (1.82%)
  • Ethan Lane (1.82%)
  • Krieshloff (1.82%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Lecherous Nocturne 45.45%Akem Manah 29.09%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
10.00% (1 overall)
  • This Post (10.00%)
  • Akem Manah (10.00%)
  • Kyle Simms (10.00%)
  • Mike Bonnetti (10.00%)
  • Robert Ingraham (10.00%)
  • Lecherous Nocturne (10.00%)
  • Alex Lancia (10.00%)
  • Mike Poggione (10.00%)
  • Ethan Lane (10.00%)
  • Krieshloff (10.00%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Akem Manah ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Kyle Simms ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mike Bonnetti ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Robert Ingraham ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Lecherous Nocturne ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Alex Lancia ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mike Poggione ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Ethan Lane ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Krieshloff ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Krieshloff ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ethan Lane ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mike Poggione ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Alex Lancia ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Lecherous Nocturne ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Robert Ingraham ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mike Bonnetti ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Kyle Simms ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Akem Manah ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (2)
Akem Manah
Lecherous Nocturne
Inbound Posts (2)
Akem Manah
Lecherous Nocturne
Last calculated: Sep 17, 5:45 AM
40

Related Content

No related content found.