Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

MonstrosityChris LollisMike PoggioneKrieshloffAlex LanciaEthan LaneAkem Manah

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 2 days ago
Comments: 0

jacierlogyn
Last login: 6 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Lecherous Nocturne

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Akem Manah
  • Monstrosity

Connected Musicians

  • Alex Lancia
  • Chris Lollis
  • Ethan Lane
  • Krieshloff
  • Mike Poggione

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
21.55% of network
(409.6K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (21.55%)
  • Akem Manah (13.79%)
  • Chris Lollis (3.45%)
  • Mike Poggione (3.45%)
  • Alex Lancia (0.86%)
  • Ethan Lane (0.86%)
  • Krieshloff (0.86%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Monstrosity 55.17%
Influence Score
i
12.50% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (12.50%)
  • Chris Lollis (12.50%)
  • Alex Lancia (12.50%)
  • Mike Poggione (12.50%)
  • Ethan Lane (12.50%)
  • Krieshloff (12.50%)
  • Akem Manah (12.50%)
  • Monstrosity (12.50%)
Direct Connections 10

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 5) = 5
$outbound = max(1, 5) = 5

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 5 * 5 = 25
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 5 / 5 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 7 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 25 *
                           ( 4 [Chris Lollis] *
                            1 [Alex Lancia] *
                            4 [Mike Poggione] *
                            1 [Ethan Lane] *
                            1 [Krieshloff] *
                            16 [Akem Manah] *
                            64 [Monstrosity]
                           )

                         = 409.6K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Chris Lollis] *
                            1 [Alex Lancia] *
                            1 [Mike Poggione] *
                            1 [Ethan Lane] *
                            1 [Krieshloff] *
                            1 [Akem Manah] *
                            1 [Monstrosity]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 5 Tags on post
Inbound 5 Posts tagging this
Connections 7 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 25
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
21.55% (409.6K overall)
  • This Post (21.55%)
  • Akem Manah (13.79%)
  • Chris Lollis (3.45%)
  • Mike Poggione (3.45%)
  • Alex Lancia (0.86%)
  • Ethan Lane (0.86%)
  • Krieshloff (0.86%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Monstrosity 55.17%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
12.50% (1 overall)
  • This Post (12.50%)
  • Chris Lollis (12.50%)
  • Alex Lancia (12.50%)
  • Mike Poggione (12.50%)
  • Ethan Lane (12.50%)
  • Krieshloff (12.50%)
  • Akem Manah (12.50%)
  • Monstrosity (12.50%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Chris Lollis ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Alex Lancia ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mike Poggione ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Ethan Lane ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Krieshloff ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Akem Manah ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Monstrosity ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Monstrosity ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Akem Manah ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Krieshloff ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ethan Lane ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mike Poggione ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Alex Lancia ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Chris Lollis ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (5)
Alex Lancia
Chris Lollis
Ethan Lane
Krieshloff
Mike Poggione
Inbound Posts (5)
Chris Lollis
Alex Lancia
Mike Poggione
Ethan Lane
Krieshloff
Last calculated: Jul 5, 3:36 AM
37

Related Content

No related content found.