How is this calculated?
The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.
// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 2) = 2
$outbound = max(1, 2) = 2
// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 2 * 2 = 4
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 2 / 2 = 1
// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 21 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
= 4 *
( 64 [Fleshgrind] *
9 [James Genenz] *
1 [Alan Collado] *
1 [Dave Barbolla] *
1 [Jesse Kehoe] *
1 [Ray Vazquez] *
1 [Rich Lipscomb] *
1 [Steve Murray (3)] *
169 [Gorgasm] *
4 [Damian Leski] *
16 [Dave Culross] *
1 [Anthony Voight] *
1 [John Hull (6)] *
1 [Kyle Christman] *
1 [Matt Kilner] *
1 [Paul Garcia (15)] *
1 [Ryan Saylor] *
1 [Sasha Chrosciewicz] *
1 [Terrence Manauis] *
1 [Tom Tangalos] *
1 [Tomasz Pilasiewicz]
)
= 24.92M
Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
= 1 *
( 1 [Fleshgrind] *
1 [James Genenz] *
1 [Alan Collado] *
1 [Dave Barbolla] *
1 [Jesse Kehoe] *
1 [Ray Vazquez] *
1 [Rich Lipscomb] *
1 [Steve Murray (3)] *
1 [Gorgasm] *
1 [Damian Leski] *
1 [Dave Culross] *
1 [Anthony Voight] *
1 [John Hull (6)] *
1 [Kyle Christman] *
1 [Matt Kilner] *
1 [Paul Garcia (15)] *
1 [Ryan Saylor] *
1 [Sasha Chrosciewicz] *
1 [Terrence Manauis] *
1 [Tom Tangalos] *
1 [Tomasz Pilasiewicz]
)
= 1
Outbound
2
Tags on post
Inbound
2
Posts tagging this
Connections
21
Total nodes
Base Node Strength
4
Base Node Influence
1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)Gorgasm 59.93%Fleshgrind 22.70%Dave Culross 5.67%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
Connected Network Hierarchy
Sort list by:
Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)