Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Dave BarbollaJames GenenzRich LipscombDerek HoffmanSteve Murray (3)FleshgrindJesse KehoeRay Vazquez

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 7 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Alan Collado

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Fleshgrind

Connected Musicians

  • Dave Barbolla
  • Derek Hoffman
  • James Genenz
  • Jesse Kehoe
  • Ray Vazquez
  • Rich Lipscomb
  • Steve Murray (3)

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
1.20% of network
(2.3K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (1.20%)
  • James Genenz (10.84%)
  • Derek Hoffman (4.82%)
  • Dave Barbolla (1.20%)
  • Jesse Kehoe (1.20%)
  • Ray Vazquez (1.20%)
  • Rich Lipscomb (1.20%)
  • Steve Murray (3) (1.20%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Fleshgrind 77.11%
Influence Score
i
11.11% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Fleshgrind (11.11%)
  • James Genenz (11.11%)
  • Dave Barbolla (11.11%)
  • Derek Hoffman (11.11%)
  • Jesse Kehoe (11.11%)
  • Ray Vazquez (11.11%)
  • Rich Lipscomb (11.11%)
  • Steve Murray (3) (11.11%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 8 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 64 [Fleshgrind] *
                            9 [James Genenz] *
                            1 [Dave Barbolla] *
                            4 [Derek Hoffman] *
                            1 [Jesse Kehoe] *
                            1 [Ray Vazquez] *
                            1 [Rich Lipscomb] *
                            1 [Steve Murray (3)]
                           )

                         = 2.3K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Fleshgrind] *
                            1 [James Genenz] *
                            1 [Dave Barbolla] *
                            1 [Derek Hoffman] *
                            1 [Jesse Kehoe] *
                            1 [Ray Vazquez] *
                            1 [Rich Lipscomb] *
                            1 [Steve Murray (3)]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 8 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
1.20% (2.3K overall)
  • This Post (1.20%)
  • James Genenz (10.84%)
  • Derek Hoffman (4.82%)
  • Dave Barbolla (1.20%)
  • Jesse Kehoe (1.20%)
  • Ray Vazquez (1.20%)
  • Rich Lipscomb (1.20%)
  • Steve Murray (3) (1.20%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Fleshgrind 77.11%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
11.11% (1 overall)
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Fleshgrind (11.11%)
  • James Genenz (11.11%)
  • Dave Barbolla (11.11%)
  • Derek Hoffman (11.11%)
  • Jesse Kehoe (11.11%)
  • Ray Vazquez (11.11%)
  • Rich Lipscomb (11.11%)
  • Steve Murray (3) (11.11%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Fleshgrind ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
James Genenz ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Dave Barbolla ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Derek Hoffman ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Jesse Kehoe ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ray Vazquez ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Rich Lipscomb ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Steve Murray (3) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Steve Murray (3) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Rich Lipscomb ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ray Vazquez ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jesse Kehoe ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Derek Hoffman ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Dave Barbolla ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
James Genenz ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Fleshgrind ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Fleshgrind
Inbound Posts (1)
Fleshgrind
Last calculated: Jun 21, 11:31 PM
24

Related Content

No related content found.