Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Legal terminologyConvenantCemetery lawImpunityAdverse possessionQuitclaimsPublic order lawReasonabilityRestraining orders

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 11 hours ago
Comments: 0

jacierlogyn
Last login: 5 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Writ of attachment

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.93% of network
(5.8K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.93%)
  • Adverse possession (3.70%)
  • Quitclaims (3.70%)
  • Public order law (3.70%)
  • Cemetery law (0.93%)
  • Convenant (0.93%)
  • Impunity (0.93%)
  • Reasonability (0.93%)
  • Restraining orders (0.93%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Legal terminology 83.33%
Influence Score
i
9.89% of network
(1.11)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (9.89%)
  • Legal terminology (10.99%)
  • Cemetery law (9.89%)
  • Convenant (9.89%)
  • Adverse possession (9.89%)
  • Quitclaims (9.89%)
  • Public order law (9.89%)
  • Impunity (9.89%)
  • Reasonability (9.89%)
  • Restraining orders (9.89%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 9 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 90 [Legal terminology] *
                            1 [Cemetery law] *
                            1 [Convenant] *
                            4 [Adverse possession] *
                            4 [Quitclaims] *
                            4 [Public order law] *
                            1 [Impunity] *
                            1 [Reasonability] *
                            1 [Restraining orders]
                           )

                         = 5.8K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1.11 [Legal terminology] *
                            1 [Cemetery law] *
                            1 [Convenant] *
                            1 [Adverse possession] *
                            1 [Quitclaims] *
                            1 [Public order law] *
                            1 [Impunity] *
                            1 [Reasonability] *
                            1 [Restraining orders]
                           )

                         = 1.11
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 9 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.93% (5.8K overall)
  • This Post (0.93%)
  • Adverse possession (3.70%)
  • Quitclaims (3.70%)
  • Public order law (3.70%)
  • Cemetery law (0.93%)
  • Convenant (0.93%)
  • Impunity (0.93%)
  • Reasonability (0.93%)
  • Restraining orders (0.93%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Legal terminology 83.33%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
9.89% (1.11 overall)
  • This Post (9.89%)
  • Legal terminology (10.99%)
  • Cemetery law (9.89%)
  • Convenant (9.89%)
  • Adverse possession (9.89%)
  • Quitclaims (9.89%)
  • Public order law (9.89%)
  • Impunity (9.89%)
  • Reasonability (9.89%)
  • Restraining orders (9.89%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Legal terminology ↗
Str: 90Inf: 1.11
Cemetery law ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Convenant ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Adverse possession ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Quitclaims ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Public order law ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Impunity ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Reasonability ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Restraining orders ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Restraining orders ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Reasonability ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Impunity ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Public order law ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Quitclaims ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Adverse possession ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Convenant ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Cemetery law ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Legal terminology ↗
Str: 90Inf: 1.11

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Legal terminology
Inbound Posts (1)
Legal terminology
Last calculated: Jul 4, 1:28 AM
15

Related Content

Topics

  • Legal terminology
  • Public order law
  • Impunity
  • Reasonability
  • Cemetery law
  • Restraining orders
  • Convenant
  • Adverse possession
  • Quitclaims