Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Ernest G. Liebold
Henry Ford
Dearborn Press
The Ford International WeeklyMaurice JolyThe Dearborn IndependentCarl W. Ackerman

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 16 hours ago
Comments: 0

jacierlogyn
Last login: 4 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

The Protocols of the Elders of Zion

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Related Images

The International Jew
Duquesne Spy Ring

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
9.41% of network
(9.8M)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (9.41%)
  • Dearborn Press (24.71%)
  • Ernest G. Liebold (5.29%)
  • The Ford International Weekly (5.29%)
  • The Dearborn Independent (1.18%)
  • Carl W. Ackerman (0.59%)
  • Maurice Joly (0.59%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Henry Ford 52.94%
Influence Score
i
10.78% of network
(2.59)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (10.78%)
  • The Dearborn Independent (21.56%)
  • Dearborn Press (12.58%)
  • Henry Ford (11.98%)
  • Ernest G. Liebold (10.78%)
  • The Ford International Weekly (10.78%)
  • Carl W. Ackerman (10.78%)
  • Maurice Joly (10.78%)
Direct Connections 8

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 4) = 4
$outbound = max(1, 4) = 4

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 4 * 4 = 16
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 4 / 4 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 7 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 16 *
                           ( 2 [The Dearborn Independent] *
                            42 [Dearborn Press] *
                            90 [Henry Ford] *
                            9 [Ernest G. Liebold] *
                            9 [The Ford International Weekly] *
                            1 [Carl W. Ackerman] *
                            1 [Maurice Joly]
                           )

                         = 9.8M

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 2 [The Dearborn Independent] *
                            1.17 [Dearborn Press] *
                            1.11 [Henry Ford] *
                            1 [Ernest G. Liebold] *
                            1 [The Ford International Weekly] *
                            1 [Carl W. Ackerman] *
                            1 [Maurice Joly]
                           )

                         = 2.59
Outbound 4 Tags on post
Inbound 4 Posts tagging this
Connections 7 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 16
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
9.41% (9.8M overall)
  • This Post (9.41%)
  • Dearborn Press (24.71%)
  • Ernest G. Liebold (5.29%)
  • The Ford International Weekly (5.29%)
  • The Dearborn Independent (1.18%)
  • Carl W. Ackerman (0.59%)
  • Maurice Joly (0.59%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Henry Ford 52.94%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
10.78% (2.59 overall)
  • This Post (10.78%)
  • The Dearborn Independent (21.56%)
  • Dearborn Press (12.58%)
  • Henry Ford (11.98%)
  • Ernest G. Liebold (10.78%)
  • The Ford International Weekly (10.78%)
  • Carl W. Ackerman (10.78%)
  • Maurice Joly (10.78%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
The Dearborn Independent ↗
Str: 2Inf: 2
Dearborn Press ↗
Str: 42Inf: 1.17
Henry Ford ↗
Str: 90Inf: 1.11
Ernest G. Liebold ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
The Ford International Weekly ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Carl W. Ackerman ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Maurice Joly ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Maurice Joly ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Carl W. Ackerman ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
The Ford International Weekly ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Ernest G. Liebold ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Henry Ford ↗
Str: 90Inf: 1.11
Dearborn Press ↗
Str: 42Inf: 1.17
The Dearborn Independent ↗
Str: 2Inf: 2

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (4)
Carl W. Ackerman
Ernest G. Liebold
Maurice Joly
The Ford International Weekly
Inbound Posts (4)
Ernest G. Liebold
The Ford International Weekly
Carl W. Ackerman
Maurice Joly
Last calculated: Jul 3, 11:01 AM
Dearborn, Wayne County, United States35

Related Content

Figures

  • Carl W. Ackerman
  • Maurice Joly
  • Henry Ford
  • Ernest G. Liebold

Organisations

  • Dearborn Press

Topics

  • The Dearborn Independent
  • The Ford International Weekly