Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Arms controlControl Arms CampaignVera KistiakowskyAustralia GroupMissile Technology Control Regime

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 3 hours ago
Comments: 0

Darragh Lennon
Last login: 5 days ago
Comments: 0

Cathal Kennedy
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

jacierlogyn
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Small Arms Survey

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Related Images

International security

Analyzing Network Connections...

Loading Map...

Nearest Locations

  • Thumbnail for Palace of Nations
    Palace of Nations0.5 km away
  • 📍
    palace-of-nations0.5 km away
  • Thumbnail for Geneva
    Geneva2.5 km away
  • 📍
    cern7.4 km away
  • 📍
    Maison La Ruine22.7 km away

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
3.33% of network
(25)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (3.33%)
  • Australia Group (3.33%)
  • Control Arms Campaign (3.33%)
  • Missile Technology Control Regime (3.33%)
  • Vera Kistiakowsky (3.33%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Arms control 83.33%
Influence Score
i
16.67% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (16.67%)
  • Arms control (16.67%)
  • Australia Group (16.67%)
  • Control Arms Campaign (16.67%)
  • Missile Technology Control Regime (16.67%)
  • Vera Kistiakowsky (16.67%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 5 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 25 [Arms control] *
                            1 [Australia Group] *
                            1 [Control Arms Campaign] *
                            1 [Missile Technology Control Regime] *
                            1 [Vera Kistiakowsky]
                           )

                         = 25

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Arms control] *
                            1 [Australia Group] *
                            1 [Control Arms Campaign] *
                            1 [Missile Technology Control Regime] *
                            1 [Vera Kistiakowsky]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 5 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
3.33% (25 overall)
  • This Post (3.33%)
  • Australia Group (3.33%)
  • Control Arms Campaign (3.33%)
  • Missile Technology Control Regime (3.33%)
  • Vera Kistiakowsky (3.33%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Arms control 83.33%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
16.67% (1 overall)
  • This Post (16.67%)
  • Arms control (16.67%)
  • Australia Group (16.67%)
  • Control Arms Campaign (16.67%)
  • Missile Technology Control Regime (16.67%)
  • Vera Kistiakowsky (16.67%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Arms control ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Australia Group ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Control Arms Campaign ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Missile Technology Control Regime ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Vera Kistiakowsky ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Vera Kistiakowsky ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Missile Technology Control Regime ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Control Arms Campaign ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Australia Group ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Arms control ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Arms control
Inbound Posts (1)
Arms control
Last calculated: Jul 26, 2:47 PM
Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland15

Related Content

Topics

  • Control Arms Campaign
  • Missile Technology Control Regime
  • Vera Kistiakowsky
  • Arms control
  • Australia Group