Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Interference
Branch County
Aunjanue Ellis-Taylor
Warwick Davis
Larenz TateRay, Indiana and MichiganIndiana and MichiganRay McCann

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 2 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Ray

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Interference
    Interference band photo

Analyzing Network Connections...

Loading Map...

Nearest Locations

  • 📍
    Khavaran Cultural Center6.9 km away
  • 📍
    Razi Cultural Center9.1 km away
  • 📍
    Tehran11.0 km away
  • 📍
    Iranian Artists Forum12.5 km away
  • Thumbnail for Azadi Cultural Complex
    Azadi Cultural Complex14.3 km away

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
2.15% of network
(255.75B)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (2.15%)
  • Branch County (17.11%)
  • Warwick Davis (5.74%)
  • Aunjanue Ellis-Taylor (3.59%)
  • Larenz Tate (1.79%)
  • Ray, Indiana and Michigan (0.48%)
  • Ray McCann (0.24%)
  • Indiana and Michigan (0.12%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Interference 68.78%
Influence Score
i
5.28% of network
(0.8564)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (5.28%)
  • Larenz Tate (17.60%)
  • Warwick Davis (14.08%)
  • Aunjanue Ellis-Taylor (12.67%)
  • Branch County (12.48%)
  • Interference (11.48%)
  • Ray, Indiana and Michigan (10.56%)
  • Indiana and Michigan (10.56%)
  • Ray McCann (5.28%)
Direct Connections 9

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 3) = 3
$outbound = max(1, 6) = 6

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 3 * 6 = 18
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 3 / 6 = 0.5

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 8 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 18 *
                           ( 15 [Larenz Tate] *
                            48 [Warwick Davis] *
                            30 [Aunjanue Ellis-Taylor] *
                            143 [Branch County] *
                            575 [Interference] *
                            4 [Ray, Indiana and Michigan] *
                            1 [Indiana and Michigan] *
                            2 [Ray McCann]
                           )

                         = 255.75B

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 0.5 *
                           ( 1.67 [Larenz Tate] *
                            1.33 [Warwick Davis] *
                            1.2 [Aunjanue Ellis-Taylor] *
                            1.18 [Branch County] *
                            1.09 [Interference] *
                            1 [Ray, Indiana and Michigan] *
                            1 [Indiana and Michigan] *
                            0.5 [Ray McCann]
                           )

                         = 0.8564
Outbound 3 Tags on post
Inbound 6 Posts tagging this
Connections 8 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 18
Base Node Influence 0.5
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
2.15% (255.75B overall)
  • This Post (2.15%)
  • Branch County (17.11%)
  • Warwick Davis (5.74%)
  • Aunjanue Ellis-Taylor (3.59%)
  • Larenz Tate (1.79%)
  • Ray, Indiana and Michigan (0.48%)
  • Ray McCann (0.24%)
  • Indiana and Michigan (0.12%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Interference 68.78%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
5.28% (0.8564 overall)
  • This Post (5.28%)
  • Larenz Tate (17.60%)
  • Warwick Davis (14.08%)
  • Aunjanue Ellis-Taylor (12.67%)
  • Branch County (12.48%)
  • Interference (11.48%)
  • Ray, Indiana and Michigan (10.56%)
  • Indiana and Michigan (10.56%)
  • Ray McCann (5.28%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Larenz Tate ↗
Str: 15Inf: 1.67
Warwick Davis ↗
Str: 48Inf: 1.33
Aunjanue Ellis-Taylor ↗
Str: 30Inf: 1.2
Branch County ↗
Str: 143Inf: 1.18
Interference ↗
Str: 575Inf: 1.09
Ray, Indiana and Michigan ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Indiana and Michigan ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ray McCann ↗
Str: 2Inf: 0.5
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Ray McCann ↗
Str: 2Inf: 0.5
Indiana and Michigan ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ray, Indiana and Michigan ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Interference ↗
Str: 575Inf: 1.09
Branch County ↗
Str: 143Inf: 1.18
Aunjanue Ellis-Taylor ↗
Str: 30Inf: 1.2
Warwick Davis ↗
Str: 48Inf: 1.33
Larenz Tate ↗
Str: 15Inf: 1.67

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (3)
Indiana and Michigan
Ray McCann
Ray, Indiana and Michigan
Inbound Posts (6)
Ray McCann
Warwick Davis
BROKEN LINK
Aunjanue Ellis-Taylor
BROKEN LINK
Larenz Tate
BROKEN LINK
Indiana and Michigan
Ray, Indiana and Michigan
Last calculated: Jun 17, 9:03 PM
Tehran, Tehran County, Iran24

Related Content

Actors

  • Warwick Davis
  • Aunjanue Ellis-Taylor
  • Larenz Tate

Locations

  • Branch County

Topics

  • Indiana and Michigan
  • Ray McCann
  • Ray, Indiana and Michigan