Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

PukkelpopPukkelpop 2007Pukkelpop 2010Pukkelpop 2012Pukkelpop 2016Pukkelpop 2019Pukkelpop 2009Pukkelpop 2011Pukkelpop 2017Hasselt

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 4 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Pukkelpop 2005

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.60% of network
(3.3K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.60%)
  • Pukkelpop 2006 (0.60%)
  • Pukkelpop 2007 (0.60%)
  • Pukkelpop 2009 (0.60%)
  • Pukkelpop 2010 (0.60%)
  • Pukkelpop 2011 (0.60%)
  • Pukkelpop 2012 (0.60%)
  • Pukkelpop 2016 (0.60%)
  • Pukkelpop 2017 (0.60%)
  • Pukkelpop 2019 (0.60%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Pukkelpop 79.04%Hasselt 14.97%
Influence Score
i
8.27% of network
(1.09)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (8.27%)
  • Pukkelpop (9.02%)
  • Hasselt (8.27%)
  • Pukkelpop 2006 (8.27%)
  • Pukkelpop 2007 (8.27%)
  • Pukkelpop 2009 (8.27%)
  • Pukkelpop 2010 (8.27%)
  • Pukkelpop 2011 (8.27%)
  • Pukkelpop 2012 (8.27%)
  • Pukkelpop 2016 (8.27%)
  • Pukkelpop 2017 (8.27%)
  • Pukkelpop 2019 (8.27%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 11 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 132 [Pukkelpop] *
                            25 [Hasselt] *
                            1 [Pukkelpop 2006] *
                            1 [Pukkelpop 2007] *
                            1 [Pukkelpop 2009] *
                            1 [Pukkelpop 2010] *
                            1 [Pukkelpop 2011] *
                            1 [Pukkelpop 2012] *
                            1 [Pukkelpop 2016] *
                            1 [Pukkelpop 2017] *
                            1 [Pukkelpop 2019]
                           )

                         = 3.3K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1.09 [Pukkelpop] *
                            1 [Hasselt] *
                            1 [Pukkelpop 2006] *
                            1 [Pukkelpop 2007] *
                            1 [Pukkelpop 2009] *
                            1 [Pukkelpop 2010] *
                            1 [Pukkelpop 2011] *
                            1 [Pukkelpop 2012] *
                            1 [Pukkelpop 2016] *
                            1 [Pukkelpop 2017] *
                            1 [Pukkelpop 2019]
                           )

                         = 1.09
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 11 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.60% (3.3K overall)
  • This Post (0.60%)
  • Pukkelpop 2006 (0.60%)
  • Pukkelpop 2007 (0.60%)
  • Pukkelpop 2009 (0.60%)
  • Pukkelpop 2010 (0.60%)
  • Pukkelpop 2011 (0.60%)
  • Pukkelpop 2012 (0.60%)
  • Pukkelpop 2016 (0.60%)
  • Pukkelpop 2017 (0.60%)
  • Pukkelpop 2019 (0.60%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Pukkelpop 79.04%Hasselt 14.97%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
8.27% (1.09 overall)
  • This Post (8.27%)
  • Pukkelpop (9.02%)
  • Hasselt (8.27%)
  • Pukkelpop 2006 (8.27%)
  • Pukkelpop 2007 (8.27%)
  • Pukkelpop 2009 (8.27%)
  • Pukkelpop 2010 (8.27%)
  • Pukkelpop 2011 (8.27%)
  • Pukkelpop 2012 (8.27%)
  • Pukkelpop 2016 (8.27%)
  • Pukkelpop 2017 (8.27%)
  • Pukkelpop 2019 (8.27%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Pukkelpop ↗
Str: 132Inf: 1.09
Hasselt ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Pukkelpop 2006 ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Pukkelpop 2007 ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Pukkelpop 2009 ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Pukkelpop 2010 ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Pukkelpop 2011 ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Pukkelpop 2012 ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Pukkelpop 2016 ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Pukkelpop 2017 ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Pukkelpop 2019 ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Pukkelpop 2019 ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Pukkelpop 2017 ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Pukkelpop 2016 ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Pukkelpop 2012 ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Pukkelpop 2011 ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Pukkelpop 2010 ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Pukkelpop 2009 ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Pukkelpop 2007 ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Pukkelpop 2006 ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Hasselt ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Pukkelpop ↗
Str: 132Inf: 1.09

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Pukkelpop
Inbound Posts (1)
Pukkelpop
Last calculated: Jun 21, 7:54 PM
15

Related Content

Festivalss

  • Pukkelpop

Topics

  • Pukkelpop 2009
  • Pukkelpop 2010
  • Pukkelpop 2011
  • Pukkelpop 2012
  • Pukkelpop 2016
  • Hasselt
  • Pukkelpop 2017
  • Pukkelpop 2006
  • Pukkelpop 2019
  • Pukkelpop 2007