Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

MimicryEyespotBatesian mimicryVocal mimicryInsect mimicryHuman mimicryComparisons of Danaus plexippus and Limenitis archippus

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 14 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 5 days ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Müllerian mimicry

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Related Images

Warning coloration
Animals mimicking ants

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
7.27% of network
(672)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (7.27%)
  • Batesian mimicry (7.27%)
  • Human mimicry (1.82%)
  • Eyespot (1.82%)
  • Insect mimicry (1.82%)
  • Vocal mimicry (1.82%)
  • Comparisons of Danaus plexippus and Limenitis archippus (1.82%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Mimicry 76.36%
Influence Score
i
12.24% of network
(1.17)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (12.24%)
  • Mimicry (14.29%)
  • Human mimicry (12.24%)
  • Batesian mimicry (12.24%)
  • Eyespot (12.24%)
  • Insect mimicry (12.24%)
  • Vocal mimicry (12.24%)
  • Comparisons of Danaus plexippus and Limenitis archippus (12.24%)
Direct Connections 4

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 2) = 2
$outbound = max(1, 2) = 2

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 2 * 2 = 4
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 2 / 2 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 7 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 4 *
                           ( 42 [Mimicry] *
                            1 [Human mimicry] *
                            4 [Batesian mimicry] *
                            1 [Eyespot] *
                            1 [Insect mimicry] *
                            1 [Vocal mimicry] *
                            1 [Comparisons of Danaus plexippus and Limenitis archippus]
                           )

                         = 672

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1.17 [Mimicry] *
                            1 [Human mimicry] *
                            1 [Batesian mimicry] *
                            1 [Eyespot] *
                            1 [Insect mimicry] *
                            1 [Vocal mimicry] *
                            1 [Comparisons of Danaus plexippus and Limenitis archippus]
                           )

                         = 1.17
Outbound 2 Tags on post
Inbound 2 Posts tagging this
Connections 7 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 4
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
7.27% (672 overall)
  • This Post (7.27%)
  • Batesian mimicry (7.27%)
  • Human mimicry (1.82%)
  • Eyespot (1.82%)
  • Insect mimicry (1.82%)
  • Vocal mimicry (1.82%)
  • Comparisons of Danaus plexippus and Limenitis archippus (1.82%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Mimicry 76.36%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
12.24% (1.17 overall)
  • This Post (12.24%)
  • Mimicry (14.29%)
  • Human mimicry (12.24%)
  • Batesian mimicry (12.24%)
  • Eyespot (12.24%)
  • Insect mimicry (12.24%)
  • Vocal mimicry (12.24%)
  • Comparisons of Danaus plexippus and Limenitis archippus (12.24%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Mimicry ↗
Str: 42Inf: 1.17
Human mimicry ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Batesian mimicry ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Eyespot ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Insect mimicry ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Vocal mimicry ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Comparisons of Danaus plexippus and Limenitis archippus ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Comparisons of Danaus plexippus and Limenitis archippus ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Vocal mimicry ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Insect mimicry ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Eyespot ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Batesian mimicry ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Human mimicry ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mimicry ↗
Str: 42Inf: 1.17

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (2)
Comparisons of Danaus plexippus and Limenitis archippus
Mimicry
Inbound Posts (2)
Mimicry
Comparisons of Danaus plexippus and Limenitis archippus
Last calculated: Jun 11, 6:18 AM
18

Related Content

Topics

  • Human mimicry
  • Mimicry
  • Batesian mimicry
  • Eyespot
  • Insect mimicry
  • Vocal mimicry
  • Comparisons of Danaus plexippus and Limenitis archippus