Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

15 MayMiyazu MatsuriMay 15Lutsk on May 13AE 2004, 125613 MayCIL XVI 000127Our Lady of FatimaSaint Mael13 May, by year

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 5 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

May 13

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Related Images

13 May postmarks

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
45.00% of network
(839.8K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (45.00%)
  • Miyazu Matsuri (5.63%)
  • 13 May (0.63%)
  • CIL XVI 000127 (0.63%)
  • Lutsk on May 13 (0.63%)
  • Our Lady of Fatima (0.63%)
  • Saint Mael (0.63%)
  • 13 May, by year (0.63%)
  • AE 2004, 1256 (0.63%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
15 May 22.50%May 15 22.50%
Influence Score
i
10.11% of network
(1.13)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (10.11%)
  • 13 May (8.99%)
  • Miyazu Matsuri (8.99%)
  • CIL XVI 000127 (8.99%)
  • Lutsk on May 13 (8.99%)
  • Our Lady of Fatima (8.99%)
  • Saint Mael (8.99%)
  • 13 May, by year (8.99%)
  • AE 2004, 1256 (8.99%)
  • 15 May (8.99%)
  • May 15 (8.99%)
Direct Connections 17

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 9) = 9
$outbound = max(1, 8) = 8

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 9 * 8 = 72
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 9 / 8 = 1.125

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 10 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 72 *
                           ( 1 [13 May] *
                            9 [Miyazu Matsuri] *
                            1 [CIL XVI 000127] *
                            1 [Lutsk on May 13] *
                            1 [Our Lady of Fatima] *
                            1 [Saint Mael] *
                            1 [13 May, by year] *
                            1 [AE 2004, 1256] *
                            36 [15 May] *
                            36 [May 15]
                           )

                         = 839.8K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1.125 *
                           ( 1 [13 May] *
                            1 [Miyazu Matsuri] *
                            1 [CIL XVI 000127] *
                            1 [Lutsk on May 13] *
                            1 [Our Lady of Fatima] *
                            1 [Saint Mael] *
                            1 [13 May, by year] *
                            1 [AE 2004, 1256] *
                            1 [15 May] *
                            1 [May 15]
                           )

                         = 1.13
Outbound 9 Tags on post
Inbound 8 Posts tagging this
Connections 10 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 72
Base Node Influence 1.125
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
45.00% (839.8K overall)
  • This Post (45.00%)
  • Miyazu Matsuri (5.63%)
  • 13 May (0.63%)
  • CIL XVI 000127 (0.63%)
  • Lutsk on May 13 (0.63%)
  • Our Lady of Fatima (0.63%)
  • Saint Mael (0.63%)
  • 13 May, by year (0.63%)
  • AE 2004, 1256 (0.63%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
15 May 22.50%May 15 22.50%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
10.11% (1.13 overall)
  • This Post (10.11%)
  • 13 May (8.99%)
  • Miyazu Matsuri (8.99%)
  • CIL XVI 000127 (8.99%)
  • Lutsk on May 13 (8.99%)
  • Our Lady of Fatima (8.99%)
  • Saint Mael (8.99%)
  • 13 May, by year (8.99%)
  • AE 2004, 1256 (8.99%)
  • 15 May (8.99%)
  • May 15 (8.99%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
13 May ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Miyazu Matsuri ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
CIL XVI 000127 ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Lutsk on May 13 ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Our Lady of Fatima ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Saint Mael ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
13 May, by year ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
AE 2004, 1256 ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
15 May ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
May 15 ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
May 15 ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
15 May ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
AE 2004, 1256 ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
13 May, by year ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Saint Mael ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Our Lady of Fatima ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Lutsk on May 13 ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
CIL XVI 000127 ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Miyazu Matsuri ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
13 May ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (9)
13 May
13 May postmarks
BROKEN LINK
13 May, by year
AE 2004, 1256
CIL XVI 000127
Lutsk on May 13
Miyazu Matsuri
Our Lady of Fatima
Saint Mael
Inbound Posts (8)
13 May
Miyazu Matsuri
CIL XVI 000127
Lutsk on May 13
Our Lady of Fatima
Saint Mael
13 May, by year
AE 2004, 1256
Last calculated: Jun 22, 4:08 PM
17

Related Content

Topics

  • Our Lady of Fatima
  • Saint Mael
  • 13 May, by year
  • AE 2004, 1256
  • 13 May
  • 15 May
  • Miyazu Matsuri
  • May 15
  • CIL XVI 000127
  • Lutsk on May 13