Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Mariel LovelandGreg Baldwin (2)Matt FerraroChristina Picciano (2)Christian Stefos MiglioresChristina PiccianoCandy Hearts

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 2 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kris Hayes

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Candy Hearts

Connected Musicians

  • Christian Stefos Migliores
  • Mariel Loveland

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
1.79% of network
(49)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (1.79%)
  • Christian Stefos Migliores (1.79%)
  • Christina Picciano (1.79%)
  • Mariel Loveland (1.79%)
  • Matt Ferraro (1.79%)
  • Christina Picciano (2) (1.79%)
  • Greg Baldwin (2) (1.79%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Candy Hearts 87.50%
Influence Score
i
12.50% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (12.50%)
  • Candy Hearts (12.50%)
  • Christian Stefos Migliores (12.50%)
  • Christina Picciano (12.50%)
  • Mariel Loveland (12.50%)
  • Matt Ferraro (12.50%)
  • Christina Picciano (2) (12.50%)
  • Greg Baldwin (2) (12.50%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 7 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 49 [Candy Hearts] *
                            1 [Christian Stefos Migliores] *
                            1 [Christina Picciano] *
                            1 [Mariel Loveland] *
                            1 [Matt Ferraro] *
                            1 [Christina Picciano (2)] *
                            1 [Greg Baldwin (2)]
                           )

                         = 49

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Candy Hearts] *
                            1 [Christian Stefos Migliores] *
                            1 [Christina Picciano] *
                            1 [Mariel Loveland] *
                            1 [Matt Ferraro] *
                            1 [Christina Picciano (2)] *
                            1 [Greg Baldwin (2)]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 7 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
1.79% (49 overall)
  • This Post (1.79%)
  • Christian Stefos Migliores (1.79%)
  • Christina Picciano (1.79%)
  • Mariel Loveland (1.79%)
  • Matt Ferraro (1.79%)
  • Christina Picciano (2) (1.79%)
  • Greg Baldwin (2) (1.79%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Candy Hearts 87.50%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
12.50% (1 overall)
  • This Post (12.50%)
  • Candy Hearts (12.50%)
  • Christian Stefos Migliores (12.50%)
  • Christina Picciano (12.50%)
  • Mariel Loveland (12.50%)
  • Matt Ferraro (12.50%)
  • Christina Picciano (2) (12.50%)
  • Greg Baldwin (2) (12.50%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Candy Hearts ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Christian Stefos Migliores ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Christina Picciano ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mariel Loveland ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Matt Ferraro ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Christina Picciano (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Greg Baldwin (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Greg Baldwin (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Christina Picciano (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Matt Ferraro ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mariel Loveland ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Christina Picciano ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Christian Stefos Migliores ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Candy Hearts ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Candy Hearts
Inbound Posts (1)
Candy Hearts
Last calculated: Jun 18, 5:25 AM
9

Related Content

Topics

  • Christina Picciano (2)
  • Greg Baldwin (2)
  • Christina Picciano
  • Matt Ferraro