Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Luke AskewHand dynamometersFrailty

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 21 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 5 days ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Homeostenosis

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Related Images

Gerontology
Anti-aging substances

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
3.23% of network
(480)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (3.23%)
  • Luke Askew (64.52%)
  • Frailty (19.35%)
  • Hand dynamometers (12.90%)
Influence Score
i
25.53% of network
(0.8334)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (25.53%)
  • Luke Askew (31.91%)
  • Hand dynamometers (25.53%)
  • Frailty (17.02%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 3 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 20 [Luke Askew] *
                            4 [Hand dynamometers] *
                            6 [Frailty]
                           )

                         = 480

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1.25 [Luke Askew] *
                            1 [Hand dynamometers] *
                            0.6667 [Frailty]
                           )

                         = 0.8334
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 3 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
3.23% (480 overall)
  • This Post (3.23%)
  • Luke Askew (64.52%)
  • Frailty (19.35%)
  • Hand dynamometers (12.90%)
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
25.53% (0.8334 overall)
  • This Post (25.53%)
  • Luke Askew (31.91%)
  • Hand dynamometers (25.53%)
  • Frailty (17.02%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Luke Askew ↗
Str: 20Inf: 1.25
Hand dynamometers ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Frailty ↗
Str: 6Inf: 0.6667
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Frailty ↗
Str: 6Inf: 0.6667
Hand dynamometers ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Luke Askew ↗
Str: 20Inf: 1.25

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Frailty
Inbound Posts (1)
Frailty
Last calculated: Jun 11, 2:04 PM
26

Related Content

Actors

  • Luke Askew

Anatomy

  • Hand dynamometers

Topics

  • Frailty