Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

David van DantzigSignificsSusan PetrilliEvert Willem BethKoloniaal Museum, HaarlemJacob Israel de HaanSemioethicsJac. van GinnekenVictoria WelbyGerrit Mannoury

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 21 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Frederik van Eeden

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
3.88% of network
(5.8K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (3.88%)
  • Victoria Welby (8.74%)
  • Jacob Israel de Haan (1.94%)
  • Semioethics (0.97%)
  • David van Dantzig (0.97%)
  • Evert Willem Beth (0.97%)
  • Gerrit Mannoury (0.97%)
  • Jac. van Ginneken (0.97%)
  • Susan Petrilli (0.97%)
  • Koloniaal Museum, Haarlem (0.97%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Significs 78.64%
Influence Score
i
8.33% of network
(2)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (8.33%)
  • Jacob Israel de Haan (16.67%)
  • Semioethics (8.33%)
  • Significs (8.33%)
  • David van Dantzig (8.33%)
  • Evert Willem Beth (8.33%)
  • Gerrit Mannoury (8.33%)
  • Jac. van Ginneken (8.33%)
  • Susan Petrilli (8.33%)
  • Victoria Welby (8.33%)
  • Koloniaal Museum, Haarlem (8.33%)
Direct Connections 4

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 2) = 2
$outbound = max(1, 2) = 2

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 2 * 2 = 4
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 2 / 2 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 10 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 4 *
                           ( 2 [Jacob Israel de Haan] *
                            1 [Semioethics] *
                            81 [Significs] *
                            1 [David van Dantzig] *
                            1 [Evert Willem Beth] *
                            1 [Gerrit Mannoury] *
                            1 [Jac. van Ginneken] *
                            1 [Susan Petrilli] *
                            9 [Victoria Welby] *
                            1 [Koloniaal Museum, Haarlem]
                           )

                         = 5.8K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 2 [Jacob Israel de Haan] *
                            1 [Semioethics] *
                            1 [Significs] *
                            1 [David van Dantzig] *
                            1 [Evert Willem Beth] *
                            1 [Gerrit Mannoury] *
                            1 [Jac. van Ginneken] *
                            1 [Susan Petrilli] *
                            1 [Victoria Welby] *
                            1 [Koloniaal Museum, Haarlem]
                           )

                         = 2
Outbound 2 Tags on post
Inbound 2 Posts tagging this
Connections 10 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 4
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
3.88% (5.8K overall)
  • This Post (3.88%)
  • Victoria Welby (8.74%)
  • Jacob Israel de Haan (1.94%)
  • Semioethics (0.97%)
  • David van Dantzig (0.97%)
  • Evert Willem Beth (0.97%)
  • Gerrit Mannoury (0.97%)
  • Jac. van Ginneken (0.97%)
  • Susan Petrilli (0.97%)
  • Koloniaal Museum, Haarlem (0.97%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Significs 78.64%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
8.33% (2 overall)
  • This Post (8.33%)
  • Jacob Israel de Haan (16.67%)
  • Semioethics (8.33%)
  • Significs (8.33%)
  • David van Dantzig (8.33%)
  • Evert Willem Beth (8.33%)
  • Gerrit Mannoury (8.33%)
  • Jac. van Ginneken (8.33%)
  • Susan Petrilli (8.33%)
  • Victoria Welby (8.33%)
  • Koloniaal Museum, Haarlem (8.33%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Jacob Israel de Haan ↗
Str: 2Inf: 2
Semioethics ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Significs ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1
David van Dantzig ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Evert Willem Beth ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Gerrit Mannoury ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jac. van Ginneken ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Susan Petrilli ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Victoria Welby ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Koloniaal Museum, Haarlem ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Koloniaal Museum, Haarlem ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Victoria Welby ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Susan Petrilli ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jac. van Ginneken ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Gerrit Mannoury ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Evert Willem Beth ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
David van Dantzig ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Significs ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1
Semioethics ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jacob Israel de Haan ↗
Str: 2Inf: 2

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (2)
Koloniaal Museum, Haarlem
Significs
Inbound Posts (2)
Significs
Koloniaal Museum, Haarlem
Last calculated: Jun 24, 2:42 AM
13

Related Content

Figures

  • David van Dantzig
  • Evert Willem Beth
  • Jacob Israel de Haan
  • Susan Petrilli

Topics

  • Semioethics
  • Victoria Welby
  • Significs
  • Koloniaal Museum, Haarlem
  • Gerrit Mannoury
  • Jac. van Ginneken