Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Brug 200, VondelbrugRoemer Visscherstraat 42, AmsterdamRoemer Visscherstraat 44, AmsterdamEerste Constantijn HuygensstraatJan Swammerdam Instituut

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 9 hours ago
Comments: 0

jacierlogyn
Last login: 5 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Eerste Constantijn Huygensstraat 120/Vondelstraat 72, Amsterdam

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Related Images

Eerste Constantijn Huygensstraat, Amsterdam

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
2.33% of network
(270)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (2.33%)
  • Brug 200, Vondelbrug (20.93%)
  • Jan Swammerdam Instituut (2.33%)
  • Roemer Visscherstraat 42, Amsterdam (2.33%)
  • Roemer Visscherstraat 44, Amsterdam (2.33%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Eerste Constantijn Huygensstraat 69.77%
Influence Score
i
16.13% of network
(1.2)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (16.13%)
  • Eerste Constantijn Huygensstraat (19.35%)
  • Brug 200, Vondelbrug (16.13%)
  • Jan Swammerdam Instituut (16.13%)
  • Roemer Visscherstraat 42, Amsterdam (16.13%)
  • Roemer Visscherstraat 44, Amsterdam (16.13%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 5 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 30 [Eerste Constantijn Huygensstraat] *
                            9 [Brug 200, Vondelbrug] *
                            1 [Jan Swammerdam Instituut] *
                            1 [Roemer Visscherstraat 42, Amsterdam] *
                            1 [Roemer Visscherstraat 44, Amsterdam]
                           )

                         = 270

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1.2 [Eerste Constantijn Huygensstraat] *
                            1 [Brug 200, Vondelbrug] *
                            1 [Jan Swammerdam Instituut] *
                            1 [Roemer Visscherstraat 42, Amsterdam] *
                            1 [Roemer Visscherstraat 44, Amsterdam]
                           )

                         = 1.2
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 5 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
2.33% (270 overall)
  • This Post (2.33%)
  • Brug 200, Vondelbrug (20.93%)
  • Jan Swammerdam Instituut (2.33%)
  • Roemer Visscherstraat 42, Amsterdam (2.33%)
  • Roemer Visscherstraat 44, Amsterdam (2.33%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Eerste Constantijn Huygensstraat 69.77%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
16.13% (1.2 overall)
  • This Post (16.13%)
  • Eerste Constantijn Huygensstraat (19.35%)
  • Brug 200, Vondelbrug (16.13%)
  • Jan Swammerdam Instituut (16.13%)
  • Roemer Visscherstraat 42, Amsterdam (16.13%)
  • Roemer Visscherstraat 44, Amsterdam (16.13%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Eerste Constantijn Huygensstraat ↗
Str: 30Inf: 1.2
Brug 200, Vondelbrug ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Jan Swammerdam Instituut ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Roemer Visscherstraat 42, Amsterdam ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Roemer Visscherstraat 44, Amsterdam ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Roemer Visscherstraat 44, Amsterdam ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Roemer Visscherstraat 42, Amsterdam ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jan Swammerdam Instituut ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Brug 200, Vondelbrug ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Eerste Constantijn Huygensstraat ↗
Str: 30Inf: 1.2

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Eerste Constantijn Huygensstraat
Inbound Posts (1)
Eerste Constantijn Huygensstraat
Last calculated: Jul 3, 11:10 PM
19

Related Content

Topics

  • Roemer Visscherstraat 44, Amsterdam
  • Brug 200, Vondelbrug
  • Eerste Constantijn Huygensstraat
  • Jan Swammerdam Instituut
  • Roemer Visscherstraat 42, Amsterdam