Skip to content

Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Mar 9Chelsea FC vs Paris Saint-Germain, Champions League round of 16, 9 March 20169 March 20169 Mar9 MarchChampions League round of 16

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 3 days ago
Comments: 0

Francesca Ladybird
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Matthew Leech
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 1

Jessica
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Darragh Lennon
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Cathal Kennedy
Last login: 3 months ago
Comments: 0

Chelsea FC vs Paris Saint-Germain

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
4.35% of network
(13.44M)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (4.35%)
  • Chelsea FC vs Paris Saint-Germain, Champions League round of 16, 9 March 2016 (39.13%)
  • 9 March 2016 (17.39%)
  • Mar 9 (13.04%)
  • 9 Mar (9.78%)
  • Champions League round of 16 (9.78%)
  • 9 March (6.52%)
Influence Score
i
12.77% of network
(2)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (12.77%)
  • 9 March (19.15%)
  • Mar 9 (17.02%)
  • 9 Mar (12.77%)
  • 9 March 2016 (12.77%)
  • Champions League round of 16 (12.77%)
  • Chelsea FC vs Paris Saint-Germain, Champions League round of 16, 9 March 2016 (12.77%)
Direct Connections 4

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 2) = 2
$outbound = max(1, 2) = 2

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 2 * 2 = 4
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 2 / 2 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 6 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 4 *
                           ( 6 [9 March] *
                            12 [Mar 9] *
                            9 [9 Mar] *
                            16 [9 March 2016] *
                            9 [Champions League round of 16] *
                            36 [Chelsea FC vs Paris Saint-Germain, Champions League round of 16, 9 March 2016]
                           )

                         = 13.44M

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1.5 [9 March] *
                            1.33 [Mar 9] *
                            1 [9 Mar] *
                            1 [9 March 2016] *
                            1 [Champions League round of 16] *
                            1 [Chelsea FC vs Paris Saint-Germain, Champions League round of 16, 9 March 2016]
                           )

                         = 2
Outbound 2 Tags on post
Inbound 2 Posts tagging this
Connections 6 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 4
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
4.35% (13.44M overall)
  • This Post (4.35%)
  • Chelsea FC vs Paris Saint-Germain, Champions League round of 16, 9 March 2016 (39.13%)
  • 9 March 2016 (17.39%)
  • Mar 9 (13.04%)
  • 9 Mar (9.78%)
  • Champions League round of 16 (9.78%)
  • 9 March (6.52%)
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
12.77% (2 overall)
  • This Post (12.77%)
  • 9 March (19.15%)
  • Mar 9 (17.02%)
  • 9 Mar (12.77%)
  • 9 March 2016 (12.77%)
  • Champions League round of 16 (12.77%)
  • Chelsea FC vs Paris Saint-Germain, Champions League round of 16, 9 March 2016 (12.77%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
9 March ↗
Str: 6Inf: 1.5
Mar 9 ↗
Str: 12Inf: 1.33
9 Mar ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
9 March 2016 ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Champions League round of 16 ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Chelsea FC vs Paris Saint-Germain, Champions League round of 16, 9 March 2016 ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Chelsea FC vs Paris Saint-Germain, Champions League round of 16, 9 March 2016 ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Champions League round of 16 ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
9 March 2016 ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
9 Mar ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Mar 9 ↗
Str: 12Inf: 1.33
9 March ↗
Str: 6Inf: 1.5

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (2)
Champions League round of 16
Chelsea FC vs Paris Saint-Germain, Champions League round of 16, 9 March 2016
Inbound Posts (2)
Chelsea FC vs Paris Saint-Germain, Champions League round of 16, 9 March 2016
Champions League round of 16
Last calculated: Oct 2, 6:31 PM
14

Related Content

Topics

  • 9 Mar
  • Mar 9
  • 9 March
  • 9 March 2016
  • Champions League round of 16
  • Chelsea FC vs Paris Saint-Germain, Champions League round of 16, 9 March 2016

A Muso community