Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Central AsiaТоҷикистонPalearcticYurtsKyrgyz History SocietyGraphics from the UNESCO Science Report, towards 2030, Chapter 14, Central AsiaChumsEthnic groups in Central AsiaMadrasas in Central AsiaPaul Pelliot

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 2 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 6 days ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Central Asian diaspora

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Related Images

Central Asian studies

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.21% of network
(6.97B)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.21%)
  • Paul Pelliot (1.89%)
  • Kyrgyz History Society (0.21%)
  • Animals of Central Asia (0.21%)
  • Chums (0.21%)
  • Ethnic groups in Central Asia (0.21%)
  • Flora of Middle Asia (0.21%)
  • Madrasas in Central Asia (0.21%)
  • Tea pots from Central Asia (0.21%)
  • Yurts (0.21%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Central Asia 47.16%Palearctic 25.26%Тоҷикистон 15.16%Kivkara 5.26%Graphics from the UNESCO Science Report, towards 2030, Chapter 14, Central Asia 3.37%
Influence Score
i
6.47% of network
(1.54)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (6.47%)
  • Palearctic (7.76%)
  • Central Asia (7.39%)
  • Тоҷикистон (7.27%)
  • Kyrgyz History Society (6.47%)
  • Animals of Central Asia (6.47%)
  • Chums (6.47%)
  • Ethnic groups in Central Asia (6.47%)
  • Flora of Middle Asia (6.47%)
  • Graphics from the UNESCO Science Report, towards 2030, Chapter 14, Central Asia (6.47%)
  • Kivkara (6.47%)
  • Madrasas in Central Asia (6.47%)
  • Paul Pelliot (6.47%)
  • Tea pots from Central Asia (6.47%)
  • Yurts (6.47%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 14 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 120 [Palearctic] *
                            224 [Central Asia] *
                            72 [Тоҷикистон] *
                            1 [Kyrgyz History Society] *
                            1 [Animals of Central Asia] *
                            1 [Chums] *
                            1 [Ethnic groups in Central Asia] *
                            1 [Flora of Middle Asia] *
                            16 [Graphics from the UNESCO Science Report, towards 2030, Chapter 14, Central Asia] *
                            25 [Kivkara] *
                            1 [Madrasas in Central Asia] *
                            9 [Paul Pelliot] *
                            1 [Tea pots from Central Asia] *
                            1 [Yurts]
                           )

                         = 6.97B

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1.2 [Palearctic] *
                            1.14 [Central Asia] *
                            1.13 [Тоҷикистон] *
                            1 [Kyrgyz History Society] *
                            1 [Animals of Central Asia] *
                            1 [Chums] *
                            1 [Ethnic groups in Central Asia] *
                            1 [Flora of Middle Asia] *
                            1 [Graphics from the UNESCO Science Report, towards 2030, Chapter 14, Central Asia] *
                            1 [Kivkara] *
                            1 [Madrasas in Central Asia] *
                            1 [Paul Pelliot] *
                            1 [Tea pots from Central Asia] *
                            1 [Yurts]
                           )

                         = 1.54
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 14 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.21% (6.97B overall)
  • This Post (0.21%)
  • Paul Pelliot (1.89%)
  • Kyrgyz History Society (0.21%)
  • Animals of Central Asia (0.21%)
  • Chums (0.21%)
  • Ethnic groups in Central Asia (0.21%)
  • Flora of Middle Asia (0.21%)
  • Madrasas in Central Asia (0.21%)
  • Tea pots from Central Asia (0.21%)
  • Yurts (0.21%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Central Asia 47.16%Palearctic 25.26%Тоҷикистон 15.16%Kivkara 5.26%Graphics from the UNESCO Science Report, towards 2030, Chapter 14, Central Asia 3.37%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
6.47% (1.54 overall)
  • This Post (6.47%)
  • Palearctic (7.76%)
  • Central Asia (7.39%)
  • Тоҷикистон (7.27%)
  • Kyrgyz History Society (6.47%)
  • Animals of Central Asia (6.47%)
  • Chums (6.47%)
  • Ethnic groups in Central Asia (6.47%)
  • Flora of Middle Asia (6.47%)
  • Graphics from the UNESCO Science Report, towards 2030, Chapter 14, Central Asia (6.47%)
  • Kivkara (6.47%)
  • Madrasas in Central Asia (6.47%)
  • Paul Pelliot (6.47%)
  • Tea pots from Central Asia (6.47%)
  • Yurts (6.47%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Palearctic ↗
Str: 120Inf: 1.2
Central Asia ↗
Str: 224Inf: 1.14
Тоҷикистон ↗
Str: 72Inf: 1.13
Kyrgyz History Society ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Animals of Central Asia ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Chums ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ethnic groups in Central Asia ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Flora of Middle Asia ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Graphics from the UNESCO Science Report, towards 2030, Chapter 14, Central Asia ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Kivkara ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Madrasas in Central Asia ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Paul Pelliot ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Tea pots from Central Asia ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Yurts ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Yurts ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tea pots from Central Asia ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Paul Pelliot ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Madrasas in Central Asia ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Kivkara ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Graphics from the UNESCO Science Report, towards 2030, Chapter 14, Central Asia ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Flora of Middle Asia ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ethnic groups in Central Asia ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Chums ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Animals of Central Asia ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Kyrgyz History Society ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Тоҷикистон ↗
Str: 72Inf: 1.13
Central Asia ↗
Str: 224Inf: 1.14
Palearctic ↗
Str: 120Inf: 1.2

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Central Asia
Inbound Posts (1)
Central Asia
Last calculated: Jun 12, 12:41 PM
30

Related Content

Locations

  • Тоҷикистон
  • Palearctic
  • Central Asia

Topics

  • Ethnic groups in Central Asia
  • Flora of Middle Asia
  • Graphics from the UNESCO Science Report, towards 2030, Chapter 14, Central Asia
  • Kivkara
  • Kyrgyz History Society
  • Madrasas in Central Asia
  • Paul Pelliot
  • Animals of Central Asia
  • Tea pots from Central Asia
  • Chums
  • Yurts