Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Shap SummitShap RuralWood HoweSeat RobertSadgillRosgillShap AbbeyHowes, Shap RuralSt Mary's Church, Longsleddale

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 1 day ago
Comments: 0

Francesca Ladybird
Last login: 5 days ago
Comments: 0

Matthew Leech
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 1

Jessica
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Darragh Lennon
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Cathal Kennedy
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Adam Seat

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Related Images

Longsleddale

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
2.67% of network
(128)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (2.67%)
  • Sadgill (1.33%)
  • St Mary's Church, Longsleddale (1.33%)
  • Rosgill (1.33%)
  • Seat Robert (1.33%)
  • Shap Abbey (1.33%)
  • Shap Summit (1.33%)
  • Wood Howe (1.33%)
  • Hare Shaw, Shap Rural (1.33%)
  • Howes, Shap Rural (1.33%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Shap Rural 85.33%
Influence Score
i
16.67% of network
(2)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (16.67%)
  • Sadgill (8.33%)
  • St Mary's Church, Longsleddale (8.33%)
  • Shap Rural (8.33%)
  • Rosgill (8.33%)
  • Seat Robert (8.33%)
  • Shap Abbey (8.33%)
  • Shap Summit (8.33%)
  • Wood Howe (8.33%)
  • Hare Shaw, Shap Rural (8.33%)
  • Howes, Shap Rural (8.33%)
Direct Connections 3

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 2) = 2
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 2 * 1 = 2
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 2 / 1 = 2

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 10 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 2 *
                           ( 1 [Sadgill] *
                            1 [St Mary's Church, Longsleddale] *
                            64 [Shap Rural] *
                            1 [Rosgill] *
                            1 [Seat Robert] *
                            1 [Shap Abbey] *
                            1 [Shap Summit] *
                            1 [Wood Howe] *
                            1 [Hare Shaw, Shap Rural] *
                            1 [Howes, Shap Rural]
                           )

                         = 128

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 2 *
                           ( 1 [Sadgill] *
                            1 [St Mary's Church, Longsleddale] *
                            1 [Shap Rural] *
                            1 [Rosgill] *
                            1 [Seat Robert] *
                            1 [Shap Abbey] *
                            1 [Shap Summit] *
                            1 [Wood Howe] *
                            1 [Hare Shaw, Shap Rural] *
                            1 [Howes, Shap Rural]
                           )

                         = 2
Outbound 2 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 10 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 2
Base Node Influence 2
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
2.67% (128 overall)
  • This Post (2.67%)
  • Sadgill (1.33%)
  • St Mary's Church, Longsleddale (1.33%)
  • Rosgill (1.33%)
  • Seat Robert (1.33%)
  • Shap Abbey (1.33%)
  • Shap Summit (1.33%)
  • Wood Howe (1.33%)
  • Hare Shaw, Shap Rural (1.33%)
  • Howes, Shap Rural (1.33%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Shap Rural 85.33%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
16.67% (2 overall)
  • This Post (16.67%)
  • Sadgill (8.33%)
  • St Mary's Church, Longsleddale (8.33%)
  • Shap Rural (8.33%)
  • Rosgill (8.33%)
  • Seat Robert (8.33%)
  • Shap Abbey (8.33%)
  • Shap Summit (8.33%)
  • Wood Howe (8.33%)
  • Hare Shaw, Shap Rural (8.33%)
  • Howes, Shap Rural (8.33%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Sadgill ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
St Mary's Church, Longsleddale ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Shap Rural ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Rosgill ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Seat Robert ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Shap Abbey ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Shap Summit ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Wood Howe ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Hare Shaw, Shap Rural ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Howes, Shap Rural ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Howes, Shap Rural ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Hare Shaw, Shap Rural ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Wood Howe ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Shap Summit ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Shap Abbey ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Seat Robert ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Rosgill ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Shap Rural ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
St Mary's Church, Longsleddale ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Sadgill ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (2)
Longsleddale
BROKEN LINK
Shap Rural
Inbound Posts (1)
Shap Rural
Last calculated: Sep 5, 4:53 AM
11

Related Content

Topics

  • Shap Rural
  • Rosgill
  • Seat Robert
  • Shap Abbey
  • Shap Summit
  • Wood Howe
  • Sadgill
  • Hare Shaw, Shap Rural
  • St Mary's Church, Longsleddale
  • Howes, Shap Rural